他异性与同感——评《胡塞尔同感现象学研究》

Alterity and Empathy——A Review of Husserl’s Phenomenology of Empathy

罗志达从超越论层次和具体的经验层次,通过阐发具身性、处境性、同感意向性和身体表达性四个重要议题来对胡塞尔的同感理论进行重新梳理,并部分澄清了一些对胡塞尔的同感理论的误解,从而证明胡塞尔的同感理论大体上仍然是成立的。罗志达的辩护依然存在着进一步完善的空间:一、他对主流学界对胡塞尔同感理论的批评的回应不够彻底;二、他的回应是建立在意向性的框架基础之上的,对于来自非意向性理论框架的批评分析不够。

Luo Zhida rearranged Husserl’s theory of empathy from the level of transcendental theory and specific experience by elucidating four important topics:embodiment,situation,the intentionality of empathy,and bodily expressiveness,which partially clarified some misunderstandings about Husserl’s theory of empathy and proved that Husserl’s theory of empathy was still valid overall.There was still room for further improvement in Luo Zhida’s defense:first,his response to the criticism of Husserl’s theory of empathy by mainstream academia was not thorough enough;second,his response was based on the frame of intentionality,and the critical analysis from the frame of non-intentionality was not enough.