期刊文献+

哲学创新的必备要件:重视“当代哲学史”

Achieving Philosophical Innovation Requires Great Attention to the Contemporary History of Philosophy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 哲学创新是“新文科”建设的重要环节。学界早已达成如下共识:加强哲学论证训练、提高逻辑推理能力是实现哲学创新的必备条件。但是,鲜有学者提及,把握哲学领域近三十年来已有成果所构成的历史,也是实现哲学创新的必备要件。本文以“哲学史与哲学论证的关系”这个老话题为出发点,从传统的“哲学史”概念中提炼出“当代哲学史”概念——由近三十年来哲学领域已有研究成果构成的历史。在此基础上,本文论证,对当代哲学史的掌握和论证推理能力相辅相成,是实现哲学创新的另一必备条件,应被高度重视。 Philosophical innovation is an important aspect of the construction of the“New Liberal Arts”.The academic community has long reached the consensus that strengthening philosophical argumentation training and improving logical reasoning abilities are essential prerequisites for achieving philosophical innovation.However,few scholars have mentioned that understanding the history formed by the achievements in philosophy over the past 30 years is also a necessary requirement for philosophical innovation.Starting from the well-known topic of the relationship between the history of philosophy and philosophical argumentation,this paper extracts the concept of“Contemporary History of Philosophy”from the traditional concept of“history of philosophy”.It refers to the history constituted by the research achievements in philosophy over the past 30 years.Based on it,this paper argues that a comprehensive grasp of the contemporary history of philosophy and proficiency in argumentation are mutually reinforcing.A grasp of contemporary history of the philosophy is another essential requirement for achieving philosophical innovation and should be highly valued.
作者 冯书怡 Feng Shuyi(School of Philosophy,Wuhan University,Wuhan,430072)
出处 《哲学评论》 2023年第2期212-225,共14页 Wuda Philosophical Review
关键词 哲学创新 哲学史 当代哲学史 哲学论证 philosophical innovation history of philosophy contemporary history of philosophy philosophical argumentation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献32

  • 1http://www. philosophicalgourmet, com/.
  • 2Hegel's Development : Towards the Sunlight (Vol. 1).
  • 3Night Thouhts (Vol. 2), Oxford University Press, 1972, 1983.
  • 4梵·因瓦根.《形而上学》.第二版,宫睿译,北京大学出版社,2007.
  • 5路克斯.《当代形而上学导论》.朱新民译,复旦大学出版社,2009.
  • 6波洛克.《当代知识论》.陈真译,复旦大学出版社,2008.
  • 7塞尔.《心灵导论》.徐英瑾译,上海人民出版社,2008.
  • 8Edmund L. Gettier, "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?", Analysis 23(1963) : 121-123.
  • 9Alex Rosenberg,Lessons from biology for philosophy of the Human Sciences, Philosophy of Social Sciences, 2005 ( 1 ).
  • 10The Interpretive Turn, eds. by David R. Heily, James F. Bohman, and Riehard Shusterman, Cornell University Press, 1991.

共引文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部