“先锋小说”教学中的“艺术真实”观补阙

On“Artistic Truth”View on the Avant-garde Novel Teaching

中国当代文学史教材普遍存在着重点从“实验性”很强的外在“叙事”和“语言”方面对20世纪80年代中后期崛起于当代文坛的先锋小说进行命名指认的惯性阐释。这在一定程度上遮蔽了现代、后现代派“艺术真实”观在当代先锋小说作家的创作意识方面所发挥的作用。本文从现代比较文学“传播”“影响”和“接受”的观照视阈出发,通过对30多年来先锋小说彰显的对这种“艺术真实”观不无“误读”性的接纳、吸收的文本迹象的追踪考察,论证了这种“场域重塑”后区别于此前社会主义现实主义的“艺术真实”观对先锋小说作家内在创作机制、创作意识方面所施加的重要影响。

There has been a common interpretation of naming and identifying the avant-garde novels that rose in the contemporary literary world in the middle and late 1980s from external“narration”and“language”with“experimental”feature in textbooks of history of contemporary Chinese literature.To a certain extent,this has obscured the role of modern and post-modern“Artistic Truth”in the creation consciousness of contemporary avant-garde novelists.Starting from the perspective of“transmission”,“influence”and“acceptance”in modern comparative literature,through tracing the textual signs of the“misreading”acceptance and absorption of the“Artistic Truth”view in the avant-garde novels over the past 30 years,this paper demonstrates the important influence of the“Artistic Truth”view on the inner creation mechanism and creation consciousness of avant-garde novel writers after the“field reconstruction”,which is different from the previous socialist realism.