倾向性归属分析的比较研究

The Comparative Study of Analyses of Disposition Ascriptions

倾向性归属分析就是明确倾向性的显现和显现条件,有简单条件分析法和一系列复杂分析法。前者面临着破坏、遮蔽、模仿和解毒剂等反例的困扰,后者如改进的条件分析法同样面临着遮蔽和解毒剂等反例的困扰,而非条件分析法如"习惯"分析法又面临着习惯与倾向性之间的相关性问题。如将倾向性理解为自然类倾向性(DK),与显现相关的本质也为类本质(PK),那么,类倾向性在个体化时其显现只具有自然必然性,能容许反例。因此,倾向性归属分析中出现的反例似乎不难理解。

Analyses of disposition ascriptions is to identify a manifestation and conditions of disposition,it includes simple conditional analyses and a series of complex analyses.Simple conditional analyses faced with the counterexamples of finkishness,masking,mimicking and antidotes.Complex analyses,such as reformed conditional analyses are also faced with the counterexamples of masking and antidotes,while non-conditional analyses,such as"habit"analyses,are faced with the problem of correlation between habits and dispositions.If disposition is understood as the disposition of natural kinds(DK),and the essence related to disposition is also the essence of kinds(PK),then DK individualization only has natural necessity and tolerates counterexamples.Therefore,it is easy to understand that the counterexamples in analyses of disposition ascriptions.