背离还是确证?——重审卢卡奇对恩格斯自然辩证法的批判

Depart or Confirm?: Reconsidering Lukacs’ Critique of Engels’ Dialectics of Nature

恩格斯的自然辩证法与马克思辩证法之间的关系是学界争论已久的话题。卢卡奇以总体性辩证法为视角,发现恩格斯的自然辩证法存在总体性辩证关系空场、辩证法外延扩大化等问题,认为这是对马克思辩证法的背离。回到马克思辩证法,基于文本,重审卢卡奇对恩格斯自然辩证法的批判,以"确证说"回应卢卡奇的"背离说",进一步厘清恩格斯的自然辩证法与马克思辩证法之间的关系,这可以为消解两者之间的对立关系提供一条新路径。

The relationship between Engels’ Dialectics of Nature and Marx’s Dialectics is a classic topic in academia. From the perspective of his totality dialectics, Lukacs found that Engels’ Dialectics of Nature had two problems: the lack of the totality dialectics and the extension of dialectics, which have departed away from Marx’s Dialectics. Returning to Marx’s Dialectics and referring to original work, along with the reconsideration of Lukacs’ critique of Engels’ Dialectics of Nature, which is a new solution to eliminating the incompatibility between Marx’s Dialectics and Engels’ Dialectics of Nature.