期刊文献+

明清经济史中的国家:一个对话的尝试 被引量:5

The State in the Economic History of Ming-Qing China:A Conversational Review
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文认为国家能力对经济的作用反映在国家的不同角色里,在比较视野下,国家能力概念为理解明清经济变迁提供了学术可能。明清时期国家的财政有保守的一面,但并非其提供国内公共产品的主要约束;明清中国的经济制度未必是资本主义式的,但在保护产权、促进金融增长等方面也有值得重视的机制;它在政策上的合理性需要具体而论,但很难说是为特定理念所主导;它的向下渗透与社会的组织过程是相互强化的,形成了能与斯密增长相容的社会权力结构。因此,很难说国家能力构成了明清中国未发生现代增长或熊彼特增长的内部原因,但它所依赖的方式很可能对近代中国的发展路径有深远影响。 This paper summarizes the academic possibility that the concept of state capacity provides for the understanding of economic history of Ming-Qing China from a comparative perspective,according to the different roles of state in economy.During the Ming and Qing Dynasties,the national finance was conservative,but it was not the main constraint for the state to provide domestic public goods.Economic institutions in the Ming-Qing China would not be regarded as capitalism,but it also had mechanisms in protecting property rights and promoting financial growth.Its rationalization in policy making needs to be studied specific,while the role of ideological should not be taken for granted.The state’s downward infiltration and social organization process reinforce each other,forming a social power structure compatible with"Smithian growth".Thus,it is difficult to say that state capacity constituted the internal causation why modern growth or"Schumpeterian growth"did not occur in Ming-Qing China,but the manner in which it relied may well have had a profound impact on the development path of modern China.
作者 彭凯翔 Peng Kaixiang
出处 《中国经济史研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第2期91-100,共10页 Researches in Chinese Economic History
关键词 国家能力 明清经济 大分流 熊彼特增长 斯密增长 State Capacity Ming-Qing Economic History Great Divergence Schumpeterian Growth Smithian Growth
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献101

共引文献93

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部