论公司决议轻微程序瑕疵的司法认定

On the Judicial Determination of a Minor Procedural Flaw in Company’s Resolution

公司决议程序瑕疵轻微且对决议形成未有实质影响的,法院可以裁量豁免决议的撤销,适用要件包括“轻微程序瑕疵”和“不对决议产生实质影响”。实证研究表明,此类司法裁判存在要件适用标准不一、要件关系判定不一、裁判理念偏颇等问题。立足于裁判的实证研究和法教义学的概念体系,可以进一步解释何为“轻微程序瑕疵”,进而探寻“不对决议产生实质影响”的真意,并明确这两个要件的体系关联。唯此,裁判者方能对公司决议程序瑕疵做实质性价值判断,在个案中精确判定公司决议程序瑕疵之于决议形成的影响力度,进而形成清晰的论理逻辑链条,实现对裁量驳回裁判尺度的妥当把握。

The court may,on a discretionary basis,exempt a company’s resolution from revocation if there is only a minor flaw in the resolution-making procedure and the flaw has no material impact on the resolution.The elements of such application include"a minor procedural flaw"and"no material impact on the resolution".Empirical studies have shown that there are some problems in the judicial decisions such as inconsistent standards for the application of the elements,inconsistent determination of the relationship between the elements and biased judicial idea.Based on the empirical study of decisions and the conceptual system in terms of legal dogmatics,we may further explain what"a minor procedural flaw"is and then explore the true meaning of"no material impact on the resolution",and clarify the systematic connection between the two elements.Only in this way can adjudicators make substantive value judgments on a procedural flaw in company’s resolution,accurately determine the degree of impact of a procedural flaw on the formation of resolutions in individual cases,and then form a clear logical chain of reasoning to complete a proper grasp of the scale of discretionary dismissals.