期刊文献+

非洲国际体系观及其联合国安理会改革政策选择 被引量:1

Africa’s View of the International System and Its Policy towards UN Security Council Reform
原文传递
导出
摘要 非洲正经历从二战后国际制度构建的被忽视者向国际体系变革的推动者转变。从追求国际平等和民主的根本诉求出发,非洲主张纠正历史不公正,实现其在联合国各机构尤其是安理会的充分代表权。推动国际体系变革和维护非洲大陆团结,是主导非洲对联合国安理会改革政策的双重目标,两者既相互借重,又在竞争性国家利益驱动下存在内在冲突。尽管非洲共同立场面临来自内部和外部的多重压力,然而非盟通过内部力量平衡和强化团结意识,坚持以统一声音参与安理会改革进程。面对内部竞争激烈、谈判胶着,非盟可能倾向于保持政策稳定。中国与非洲共同致力于推动国际关系民主化和提升发展中国家的制度性话语权,在国际体系改革进程中具有广阔的合作空间。 Africa is undergoing a transformation from a neglected party at the end of World War II to an agent of change in the international system.Regarding its fundamental aspirations for international equality and democracy,Africa advocates for the redress of historical injustices and the full representation of Africa in various United Notions(UN)bodies,especially the UN Security Council(UNSC).Promoting changes in the international system and preserving the continent’s unity are the twin goals that dominate Africa’s policy on UNSC reform,both of which draw on each other and are inherently conflicting when driven by competing national interests.Despite the multiple internal and external pressures on the Common African Position,the African Union(AU)has insisted on participating in the Security Council reform process with a unified voice through an internal balance of power and a strengthened sense of solidarity.Facing fierce internal competition with negotiations in stalemate,the AU tends to maintain the stability of its policy.China and Africa share a common commitment to promote the democratization of international relations in order to enhance the institutional voice of developing countries,and have broad space for cooperation in the process of international system reform.
作者 毛瑞鹏 Mao Ruipeng(Institute of Global Governance,Shanghai Institutes for International Studies,Shanghai 200233)
出处 《中国非洲学刊》 2022年第2期39-59,144-145,共23页 JOURNAL OF CHINA-AFRICA STUDIES
关键词 非洲国际体系观 安理会改革 非洲共同立场 埃祖尔韦尼共识 非盟政策选择 Africa’s view of the international system UN Security Council reform Common African Position Ezulwini Consensus Africa’s policy choice
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献39

  • 1.[EB/OL].www.africa-union.org.,.
  • 2.[EB/OL].www.rfi.fr.,27/07/2005.
  • 3.中国常驻联合国代表王光亚11月10日在第60届联大审议安理会改革议题时的发言[EB/OL].外交部网站,.
  • 4.我国人均森林占有面积仅为世界的1/5[EB/OL].www.XINHUANET.com.,2005—3—4.
  • 5斯蒂芬·D.克拉斯纳.《结构冲突:第三世界对抗全球自由主义》(李小华译),175-176页,浙江人民出版社,2001.
  • 6[英]爱德华·卡尔.《20年危机(1919-1939):国际关系研究导论》,世界知识出版社2005年版,第191、194页.
  • 7Barbara Koremenos, Charles Lipson, and Duncan Snidal, "The Rational Design of International Institutions" in International Organization , Volume 55, Number 4.Autumn, 2001, p.762.
  • 8Patrick A. MCCarthy, Hierarchy and Flexibility in World Politics:Adaptation to shifting Power distributions in the United Nations Security Council and the International Monetary Fund , European University institute, 1998, p.4.
  • 9Jukka Sihvo, “Pandoras Box: Reviewing the Composition of the UN Security Council in the Light of British and French Experience 1945 - 1963”, in Nordic Journal of International Law , Volume 66, Number 2 - 3, 1997, pp. 89 - 90.
  • 10摩根索.《国际纵横策论:争强权求和平》,上海译文出版社1995年舨,第64页.

共引文献5

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部