期刊文献+

2013年-2018年某医院剖宫产指征变化分析 被引量:2

Analysis on Changes of Cesarean Section Indications of a Hospital from 2013 to 2018
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析近年来剖宫产率及剖宫产指征的变化趋势,为合理有效地调控剖宫产率提供科学依据。方法采用SAS9.4软件对某院2013年1月1日-2018年12月31日足月分娩产妇24701病例数据进行回顾性统计分析。结果剖宫产率呈递减趋势,全面二孩政策实施后的剖宫产率小于实施前(P<0.001)。6年间剖宫产指征中疤痕子宫占比最大(25.99%),占比最小的为双胎(0.85%)。剖宫产指征构成在政策实施后大于实施前的有疤痕子宫、胎儿窘迫和引产失败(P<0.05)。6年间剖宫产指征顺位变化中疤痕子宫始终居于前2位,顺位变化最大的是胎儿窘迫,由2013年的第8位上升到2018年的第2位;产妇要求剖宫产由2013年的第1为降低到2018年的第7位。结论临床医师应重点关注疤痕子宫、胎儿窘迫、引产失败等原因造成的剖宫产,严控剖宫产指征,降低剖宫产率。 Objectives To analyze the changing trend of cesarean section rate and indications in recent years,and provide scientific basis for rational and effective control of cesarean section rate.Methods SAS9.4 software was used to analyze the data of 24701 parturient giving birth at term from January,1 st 2013 to December,31 st 2018.Results The cesarean section rate from 2013 to 2018 showed a decreasing trend,and the cesarean section rate after the implementation of the universal two-child policy was lower than before(P<0.001).Scar uterus accounted for the largest proportion(25.99%)and the smallest proportion was twins(0.85%).The indications of cesarean section were greater after the implementation of the policy than before(P<0.05).During the 6 years,the scar uterus always ranked the top 2 in the sequence of cesarean indications,and the largest sequence change was fetal distress,which rose from the 8 th place in 2013 to the 2 nd place in 2018.The demand for cesarean section dropped from no.1 in 2013 to no.7 in 2018.Conclusions Clinicians should pay more attention to cesarean section caused by scar uterus,fetal distress and failure of induction of labor,strictly control the indications of cesarean section and reduce the rate of cesarean section.
作者 周玲玲 王萍 王梁一 黄燕 Zhou Lingling;Wang Ping;Wang Liangyi;Huang Yan(Department of Information,DapingHospital of Army Medical University,Chongqing 400042,China;不详)
出处 《中国病案》 2020年第1期92-94,共3页 Chinese Medical Record
关键词 剖宫产率 指征 二孩政策 疤痕子宫 Cesarean section rate Indications Two-child policy Uterine scar
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献123

  • 1汪萍,苏悦,周学勤.妊娠期妇女对分娩方式选择的调查分析[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2006,14(5):80-81. 被引量:8
  • 2Walker R, Turnbu11 D, Wilkinson C. Strategies to address global cesarean section rates: a review of the evidence[J]. Birth, 2002,29:28-39.
  • 3Betrdn AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates[l]. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 2007,21:98-113.
  • 4C6ceres IA, Arcaya M, Declercq E, et al. Hospital differences in cesarean deliveries in Massachusetts (US)2004-2006: the case against case-mix artifact [J]. PLoS One, 2013,8:e57817.
  • 5Blumenthal NJ, Harris RS, O'Connor MC,et al. Changing caesarean section rates. Experience at a Sydney obstetric teaching hospital [J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 1984, 24: 246-251.
  • 6Long Q, Klemetti R, Wang Y, et al. High Caesarean section rate in rural China: is it related to health insurance (New Co- operative Medical Scheme)? [J]. Soc Sei Med, 2012, 75:733- 737.
  • 7Leung GM, Lam TH, Thach TQ, et al. Rates of cesarean births in Hong Kong: 1987-1999[J]. Birth, 2001,28:166-172.
  • 8Wu WL. Cesarean delivery in Shantou, China: a retrospective analysis of 1922 women[J]. Birth, 2000,27: 86-90.
  • 9Cai WW, Marks JS, Chen CH, et al. Increased cesarean section rates and emerging patterns of health insurance in Shanghai, China[J]. Am J Public Health, 1995,88:777-750.
  • 10Tang S, Li X, Wu Z. Rising caesarean delivery rate in primiparous women in urban China: evidence from three nationwide household health surveys[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2006,195:1527-1532.

共引文献1135

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部