期刊文献+

场外配资证券监管与刑事追责的界分与衔接 被引量:1

The Boundary and Connection between Financial Regulation and Criminal Accountability on Securities Credit by Banks or Persons other than Brokers or Dealers
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国关于场外配资的证券监管思路日益清晰、监管措施亦日趋明确。自《证券法》于2019年12月修改之后,场外配资的刑事追责司法案例集中爆发,金融监管与刑事问责的界限和衔接问题突出。中央加快健全证券执法司法体制要求理顺证券监管执法与刑事执法的关系。证券监管以维护证券市场公平和保护投资者等为价值目标,以有效监管和实质重于形式为基本原则;刑事问责以保障人权和保护法益为宗旨,罪刑法定和谦抑是基本原则。在不同的价值目标指引下,适用不同基本原则,不能将证券监管部门认定的场外配资非法经营行政违法直接认定为非法经营罪,只有在符合“国家规定”的构成要件时才能认定为犯罪。证券监管机构与司法部门应当建立沟通协调机制,明确金融业务的具体种类和性质,其中一类部门执法之后,另一类执法部门注意及时“跟进”或“补位”。 In China,the idea of securities regulation on securities credit by banks or persons other than brokers or dealers is becoming clearer and clearer,and the regulatory measures are becoming more and more specific.Since the Securities Law was amended in December 2019,judicial cases of criminal liability for securities credit have broken out,and the boundary and connection between financial supervision and criminal accountability are prominent.The central government needs to speed up the improvement of the judicial system of securities law enforcement and straighten out the relationship between“securities regulation and law enforcement”and“criminal law enforcement”.Securities regulation takes financial security and financial consumer protection as the value goals,and effective supervision and substance over form as the basic principles.Criminal accountability aims at protecting human rights and protecting legal interests,and legality and modesty are the basic principles.Under the guidance of different value goals and the application of different basic principles,securities credit violating the administrative law cannot be directly recognized as a crime.It can only be recognized as a crime if it meets the requirements of criminal law.Securities regulatory agencies and judicial departments should establish a mechanism of communication and coordination to clarify the specific types and nature of financial products or services.After one department enforces the law,the other law enforcement department should pay attention to timely"following up"or"filling the gaps".
作者 李西臣 李云捷 Li Xi-chen;Li Yun-ji(Law School,Xihua University,Chengdu 610039,China;School of Humanity and Law,Sichuan Open University,Chengdu 610073,China)
出处 《政法学刊》 2022年第1期112-120,共9页 Journal of Political Science and Law
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“金融科技背景下智能合约的法律问题研究”(19BFX120) 教育部春晖计划项目“我国征信业管理中的法律问题研究”(S2015042)
关键词 场外配资 证券监管 融资融券 刑事追责 Securities Credit by Banks or Persons other than Brokers or Dealers Securities Regulation Margin Trading and Short Selling Criminal Accountability
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献172

共引文献989

同被引文献33

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部