期刊文献+

主权与人权:新冠肺炎疫情与泰国政治发展研究

Sovereignty and Human Rights:Research on COVID-19 and Thailand’s Political Development
原文传递
导出
摘要 泰国是最早发现新冠肺炎确诊病例的国家之一,自2020年1月31日新冠肺炎疫情暴发以来,泰国政府积极有效应对疫情危机,截至2020年8月9日,因新冠肺炎疫情而死亡的人数仅有58人,相对于泰国的国情与国力来说,在疫情防控工作方面的成效较为出色。与此同时,在新冠肺炎疫情的防控过程中,泰国的经济社会发展速度明显下滑,这就构成了泰国新冠肺炎疫情防控工作的一体两面,如何兼顾就成了考验泰国巴育政府治国理政智慧的体现,也是决定后疫情时代泰国政治深度发展的一个挑战。本文将从主权与人权的视角对泰国新冠肺炎疫情、经济社会以及政治发展进行分析研究,探索泰国政治发展的内在逻辑,厘清泰国政治的两股势力,即“他信体系”势力与“反他信体系”势力之间的政治角逐如何影响泰国政治发展。 Thailand is one of the first countries to detect confirmed Covid-19 cases,since the outbreak of Covid-19 on January 31,2020,the Thai government has actively responded.Till August 9,2020,only 58 people have died due to the COVID-19.The effectiveness of the epidemic prevention and control work is relatively good,considering Thailand’s national conditions and national strength.At the same time,in the process of prevention and control of COVID-19,Thailand’s economic and social development speed has declined significantly.The above-mentioned constitutes the two sides of Thailand’s prevention and control of COVID-19.And how to balance it has become a test of the country’s political wisdom of the Prayut’s government and a challenge that determines the deep development of Thailand,s politics in the post-epidemic era.Therefore,this article will analyze the COVID-19,economic,social,and political development of Thailand from the perspective of sovereignty and human rights.It explores the inherent logic of Thai political development,and clarifies how the political competition between the"Thaksin System"forces and the"Anti-Thaksin System"force affect Thai political development.
作者 王家榜 Wang Jiabang(Kunming Metallurgy College)
出处 《中国-东盟研究》 2020年第2期59-70,共12页 China-ASean Studies
关键词 主权 人权 新冠肺炎疫情 泰国政治 Sovereignty Human Rights COVID-19 Thailand’s Politics
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献39

  • 1托尼·麦克格鲁,陈家刚.走向真正的全球治理[J].马克思主义与现实,2002,54(1):33-42. 被引量:141
  • 2David Held & Anthony McGrew, Governing Globalizalion,Polity Press, 2002,p305-324.
  • 3Gordon Smith & Mois Naim, Altered States: Globalization,Sovereignty, and Governance, IDRC, 1999, p27.
  • 4Susan Strange, The Defective State, Daedalus, Spring 1995, p55-74.
  • 5Herbertt Dittgen, Would without borders? Reflecfiom on the future of the nation-state,Govemment and Opposition, Vo134, No2, 1999.
  • 6Jan Aart Scholte, Global Capitalism and the State, International Affairs 73:427 - 45 ,July1997.
  • 7Paul Hirst & Grahame Thompson, Globalization and the Future of the Nation State, Economy and Society, Vo124,No.3,1995, p408 - 442.
  • 8Leo Panitch, Globalization and the State, Socialist Register, 1994.
  • 9Linda Weiss, Globalization and the Myth of the Powerless State,New Left Review 225:3 - 27,1997.
  • 10John Meyer et al , World Society and the Nation- State,American Journal of Sociology103,1997.

共引文献126

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部