摘要
由于历史原因,我国内地仲裁中的送达与民事诉讼高度相似,呈现"诉讼化"的特点。但近年来,部分领先仲裁已经着力于采用更为灵活、高效、低成本的送达方式。然而,要从根本上扭转传统的司法观念仍任重道远。参照《联合国国际贸易法委员会仲裁示范法》及相关国际标准,从立法、仲裁实践和仲裁司法审查三个维度建立起"去诉讼化"的仲裁送达体系,以实现正当程序和效率的平衡。
In China’s mainland,service of documents in arbitration is highly analogous to that in civil litigation,which can be regarded as an example of judicialization of arbitration.Over past few years,leading arbitration institutions have endeavored to promote a more flexible,time and cost effective service mechanism.Nevertheless,more efforts shall be made to convert traditional judicial opinions.By reference to UNCITRAL Model Law and relating practice in international arbitration,a non-litigation delivery system shall be established from aspects of legislation,arbitral practice and judicial review,to strike a balance between due process and efficiency.
出处
《仲裁研究》
2020年第2期106-120,共15页
Arbitration Study
关键词
仲裁诉讼化
仲裁送达
正当程序
效率
Judicialization of arbitration
Service in arbitration
Due process
Efficiency