对国内仲裁裁决司法监督之实证研究(上)——以深圳市中级人民法院案例为视角

An Empirical Study on Judicial Supervision of Domestic Arbitral Awards(Ⅰ)——From the Perspective of Shenzhen Intermediate Court Case

商事仲裁作为一种制度化的司法外民商事争端解决机制,其日益普及的显著特征就在于仲裁具有"一裁终局"特性。为防止"一裁终局"走向极端,需要引入司法监督机制。司法对仲裁的监督手段主要表现为撤销或不予执行仲裁裁决。我国《仲裁法》第58条、第63条、第70条、第71条,《民事诉讼法》第237条、第274条分别规定了国内仲裁裁决和涉外仲裁裁决的撤销和不予执行制度,赋予当事人在法定条件下对仲裁的终局性提出异议。本文以国内商事仲裁案件为研究对象,以深圳市中级人民法院公开的569篇仲裁裁决文书为视角,以期窥探目前仲裁裁决之司法监督现状。

Commercial arbitration,as a mechanism for settling civil and commercial disputes outside the judicial system,is characterized by the"final ruling"characteristic.In order to prevent the"final ruling"from going to extremes,judicial supervision mechanism should be introduced.The main means of judicial supervision over arbitration are revocation or non-enforcement of arbitral awards.Articles 58,63,70 and 71 of China’s Arbitration Law,237 and 274 of the Civil Procedure Law respectively stipulate the system of revocation and non-enforcement of domestic arbitral awards and foreign arbitral awards,giving the parties the right to object to the finality of arbitration under legal conditions.Taking domestic commercial arbitration cases as the research object,this paper takes569 arbitration award documents published by Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court as the perspective,with a view to prying into the current situation of judicial supervision of arbitration awards.