监察实践中管辖竞合的类型化分析与解决

Classified Analysis and Solutions of Jurisdiction Concurrence in Supervision Practice

监察机关在反腐败体系中居主导地位,但这不意味着其独自承担反腐败责任。实践中需要根据案件罪名对监察案件的管辖竞合问题进行类型化剖析,从共管罪名、共享罪名和共通罪名三个维度对监察实践中的管辖问题加以解决。对于监察机关与检察机关共享管辖权的罪名,为充分保障被追诉人的诉讼权利,在规定“检察管辖优先”的同时应当结合有利于被追诉人的单向共通规则,将这一规定落到实处。同时,对于在监察与刑事司法互涉案件中的管辖竞合问题,需要明确并案管辖的适用范围,并在分案管辖的情形下适当吸收“主罪原则”,根据数罪的性质与严重程度确定主调查/侦查机关,平衡监察调查与保障人权的双重价值。

The supervisory organ plays a leading role in the anti-corruption system,but this does not mean that it undertakes the anti-corruption responsibility alone.In practice,it is necessary to adopt classified analysis of the jurisdiction concurrence of supervision cases according to the case charges,and solve the jurisdiction problems in supervision practice from the three dimensions of co-management charges,shared charges and common charges.For the charges of shared jurisdiction between supervisory organs and procuratorial organs,in order to fully protect the litigation rights of the accused,the stipulation of"procuratorial jurisdiction priority"should be implemented in combination with the one-way rule which is in favor of the accused.At the same time,for the issue of jurisdictional concurrence in cases involving supervision and criminal justice,it is necessary to clarify the scope of application of combined jurisdiction,properly absorb the"principle of principal crime"in the case of divisional jurisdiction,determine the principal investigation organ according to the nature and severity of several crimes,and balance the dual value of supervisory investigation and the protection of human rights.