期刊文献+

公共伦理的价值观界定:在中国广西壮族自治区地方公共管理中的应用

The characterisation of the values of public ethics:application to territorial public management in the province of Guangxi(China)
原文传递
导出
摘要 今天,政治人物的合法性和公众对公共决策和管理的信心越来越依赖于对其伦理规范的评价方式(Kolthoff et al.,2013)。当代社会的"道德多元性和文化多样性"(Boisvert,2008)使公共伦理成为一种新的理论框架,需要从它对各种各样的、往往是相互冲突的价值观之间作出妥协的角度来探讨。然而,在实践中,这种妥协似乎将公共伦理的价值观仅限于围绕行为准则或管理程序而确立的善治原则上(Rochet,2011)。我们研究的问题始于就这些价值观的多样性提出疑问;研究目标是通过补充新公共价值观的概念框架(Moore,1995;Nabatchi,2011)对公共伦理的价值观进行分类,特别是界定文献中尚未阐明的交往伦理的价值观。 Today,the legitimacy of politicians and public confidence in public decision-making and administration are increasingly dependent on the way in which their ethics are appraised(Kolthoff et al.,2013).The‘moral pluralism and cultural diversity’of contemporary society(Boisvert,2008)make public ethics a new theoretical framework to be explored from the point of view of the compromises it makes between various,often conflicting,values.Yet in practice,this compromise seems to limit the values of public ethics to principles of good governance formalised around codes of conduct or managerial procedures(Rochet,2011).Our research question sets out to question the variety of these values;the research objective being to develop a categorisation of the values of public ethics by supplementing the conceptual framework of New Public Value(Moore 1995;Nabatchi,2011),in particular,by characterising the values of the ethics of interaction not yet illustrated in the literature.
作者 劳伦特·梅里亚德 耿小平(译) 杨柳(审校) 崔玲(审校) Laurent Méiade(University of Auvergne,France)
出处 《国际行政科学评论(中文版)》 2019年第1期149-170,共22页 International Review of Administrative Sciences
关键词 中国 伦理 新制度主义 公共管理 公共价值观 China ethics neo-institutionalism public management public values
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部