地方集体行动中的混合与整合:一个分析框架

Hybridity and integration in local collective action:an analytical framework

整合性地域措施能够通过部门逻辑的混合成功地消除公共行为的筒仓结构吗?根据各种不同形式的研究,以及诸多评估整合性地域措施对地方社会发展影响的研究,本文提出了一个解决这个问题的分析框架。我们认为整合是根据四种组织体制进行的,其作用方式从简单的部门机构并置到其组织逻辑的混合。我们识别的组织体制包括操作网络、组织间隙活力、相互适应以及制度融合。每一种组织体制都产生于某种实践经验中各具体动力之间的相互作用,而每种实践经验又是既定环境与超地方的社会一制度过程的产物,这在地方层面上导致了新的协调公共与集体行动的思考和组织方式。

Can an integrated territorial approach successfully do away with the silo structure that marks public action through the hybridisation of sectoral logics?Drawing from various strands of research,as well as an assessment of multiple studies on the impact of integrated territorial approaches on local social development,this article develops an analytical framework to address this question.We argue that integration takes place according to four regimes,whose dynamics range from the simple juxtaposition of sectoral organisations to a hybridisation of their organisational logics.The regimes we identify are operational networking,interstitial effervescence,collaborative accommodation and institutional convergence.Each emerges from an interaction between the specific dynamics of each experience in a given milieu and supra-local socio-institutional processes,which generate new ways of conceiving and organising the coordination of public and collective action at the local level.