期刊文献+

“大数据杀熟”法律规制的困境与出路——从消费者的权利保护到经营者算法权力治理 被引量:85

The Dilemma of Legal Regulation to “Big Data Swindle Acquaintances” and Way Out: from the Protection of “Consumers’ Rights” to the Governance of Operators’ Algorithm Power
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "大数据杀熟"侵害了消费者的权利,但依据现行法律很难认定其法律性质。"大数据杀熟"具有很强的技术特征,实质上是经营者滥用算法权力的结果。从传统消费者权利保护路径,运用合同法、侵权法、消保法、价格法、反垄断法等规制"大数据杀熟"面临着诸多困难。从根源上看,"大数据杀熟"并非单纯的法律规制问题,而是算法权力的治理问题。治理算法权力应遵循技术发展与权利保护相平衡、内部监督与外部监管相结合以及事前管控与事后追责相并重等原则。通过经营者自律、行业协会引导、公权机构监管、消费者自我保护、公众广泛参与等途径治理算法权力,才可能有效保护人工智能时代消费者的合法权益。 "Big Data Swindle Acquaintances" infringes the "Consumers’ Rights" on the surface,but in fact,it is difficult to identify its legal nature according to the existing law."Big Data Swindle Acquaintances"has strong technical characteristics,which is essentially the result of operators abusing algorithm power. From the traditional consumer rights protection path,using contract law,tort law,consumer protection law,price law,anti-monopoly law to regulate "Big Data Swindle Acquaintances" is faced with many difficulties. From the root,"Big Data Swindle Acquaintances" is not simply a legal regulation problem,but a governance problem of algorithm power. Governing algorithm power should follow the principles of balance between technology development and right protection,combination of internal control and external supervision,and equal emphasis on pre-control and post-accountability. It is possible to effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of consumers in the era of artificial intelligence by means of regulating algorithm power through self-regulation of operators,guidance of industry associations,supervision of public authorities,self-protection of consumers,and extensive participation of the public.
作者 廖建凯 LIAO Jiankai(Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处 《西南政法大学学报》 2020年第1期70-82,共13页 Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词 大数据杀熟 算法 消费者的权利 经营者 算法权力 big data swindle acquaintances algorithm consumers’ rights operator algorithm power
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献66

  • 1张素华.个人信息商业运用的法律保护[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,21(2):36-39. 被引量:30
  • 2洪海林.个人信息保护立法理念探究——在信息保护与信息流通之间[J].河北法学,2007,25(1):108-113. 被引量:43
  • 3刘德良.个人信息的财产权保护[J].法学研究,2007,29(3):80-91. 被引量:300
  • 4[美]阿丽塔.L.艾伦、理查德.C.托克音顿:《美国隐私法:学说、判例与立法》,冯建妹等译,中国民主法制出版社2004年版,第30页.
  • 5[德]卡尔·拉伦茨 王晓晔译.《德国民法通论》[M].法律出版社,2003年版.第598页.
  • 6[美]安德鲁·杰·麦克拉格.《打开隐私侵权的封闭空间:公共场所隐私侵权理论》,骆俊菲译.张民安主编.《侵扰他人安宁的隐私侵权》,中山大学出版社2012年版,第298页.
  • 7, Rebecca Lowe, Digital Identity--Me, Myself and 1,67 No. 5 IBA Global Insight 14,October/Novetnber, 2013.
  • 8http://caseshare.cn,该平台由北京北大英华科技有限公司运营.
  • 9《最高人民法院公布8起利用信息网络侵害人身权益典型案例》(2014年10月10日).
  • 10参见[2014]穗中法立民终字第2604号《民事裁定书》.

共引文献587

同被引文献837

引证文献85

二级引证文献247

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部