期刊文献+

参照依赖和损失规避对个体收入分配公平判断的影响 被引量:1

The Influence of Reference Dependence and Loss Aversion on The Fair Judgment of Individual Income Distribution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 收入分配公平判断是人们对自己收入所得公平与否的主观评价。通过对参照点和收入金额的控制,探讨参照依赖和损失规避对收入分配公平判断的共同影响。结果发现,(1)民众的收入公平判断受参照点的影响,在有参照点的情景下比无参照点情景下更感觉不公平;(2)不同工资水平下,民众的公平判断具有显著差异,而且民众对低于平均工资的"受损"比高于平均工资同等金额的"受益"赋予的公平感的权重更大,即存在得失感受的不对称;(3)不同的工资参照点、多得和少得的分配结果共同影响民众的公平判断,即损失规避在参照依赖对公平判断的影响中起调节作用。 Fair judgment of income distribution is a subjective evaluation of people’s fairness in their income.Through the control of reference points and income amount,the common influence of reference dependence and loss aversion on fairness judgment of income distribution is discussed.It is found that(1)The fairness judgment of the people’s income is affected by the reference point,and it is more unfair in the case of the reference point than in the case of no reference point;(2)Under different wage levels,the public’s fair judgments are significantly different,and the public has a greater weighting of the"damage"below the average wage than the"benefit"of the same amount above the average wage;Which is asymmetry of gain and loss;(3)Different wage reference points,more and less distribution results affect the fair judgment of the people,that is,loss aversion plays a regulatory role in the influence of reference dependence on fair judgment.
作者 徐富明 黄龙 沈友田 张凤华 向玲 Xu Fuming;Huang Long;Shen Youtian;Zhang Fenghua;Xiang Ling(School of Education Science,Nanning Normal University,Nanning 530299;School of Psychology,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022;School of Humanities and Management,Wannan Medical College,Wuhu 341002)
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第1期79-83,95,共6页 Psychological Exploration
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71571083,71971103) 江西省社会科学“十三五”(2018)规划项目(18JY10) 江西省高校人文社会科学研究2018年度项目(XL18103).
关键词 公平判断 收入分配 参照依赖 损失规避 fairness judgment income distribution reference dependence loss aversion
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献184

  • 1何贵兵,于永菊.决策过程中参照点效应研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(3):408-412. 被引量:44
  • 2陆静怡,谢晓非,Wang, M.,唐鑫.(2013).风险决策的双参照点模型.第十六届全国心理学学术会议口头报告, 南京,中国.
  • 3Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
  • 4Bauer, I., & Wrosch, C. (2011). Making up for lost opportunities: The protective role of downward social comparisons for coping with regrets across adulthood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 215-228.
  • 5Bault, N.,Coricelli,G., & Rustichini, A. (2008). Interdependent utilities: How social ranking affects choice behavior. PLoS One, 3, e3477.
  • 6Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90, 166—93.
  • 7Boyce, C. J., Brown, G. D. A., & Moore, S. C. (2010). Money and happiness: Rank of income, not income, affects life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 21, 471-475.
  • 8Brickman, P., & Bulman, R. J. (1977). Pleasure and pain in social comparison. In J. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives (pp. 149-186). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
  • 9Buunk, A. P., & Gibbons, F. X. (2007). Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 3-21.
  • 10Cheung, E., & Mikels, J, A. (2011). I'm feeling lucky: The relationship between affect and risk-seeking in the framing effect. Emotion, 11, 852-859.

共引文献95

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部