摘要
必要共同诉讼人之一部提起上诉,于程序,将对整个案件产生移审效和判决确定的阻断效;同时,部分上诉效力将及于其他共同诉讼人,全体共同诉讼人得共同进入上诉审程序;于实体,二审法院的审理应当围绕上诉人的上诉请求进行,裁判主文的对象为全体共同诉讼人。实践中,应当明确部分必要共同诉讼人的上诉效力及于其他共同诉讼人;二审法院应当围绕上诉人的请求审理,判决结果对全体共同诉讼人具有约束力。为了充分保障未上诉者的程序权利,法官应当积极予以释明。若类似的必要共同诉讼人明确拒绝参加诉讼,出于尊重其处分权的考虑可以不将其纳入二审程序,但仍要受二审判决效力的约束。
Some necessary co-litigants file an appeal.In terms of procedures,the case will be transferred to the court of second instance,and the validity of the judgment will be blocked;at the same time,the effect of the appeal of some necessary co-litigants will affect other co-litigants,all The joint litigants enter the appellate trial;in terms of substance,the trial of the court of second instance should focus on the appellant’s appeal request,and the subject of the judgment is all the joint litigants.In practice,it is necessary to clarify the validity of the appeal of some necessary co-litigants and to other co-litigants;the court of second instance should hear the appellant’s request,and the judgment result is binding on all co-litigants.In order to fully protect the procedural rights of those who have not appealed,the judge should actively explain.If similar necessary co-litigants explicitly refuse to participate in the litigation,they may not be included in the second-instance procedure for consideration of their right of disposal,but they are still subject to the validity of the second-instance judgment.
出处
《现代法治研究》
2021年第1期98-110,共13页
Journal of Modern Rule of Law
关键词
必要共同诉讼
上诉效力
有利原则
合一确定
Necessary Joint Litigation
Validity of Appeal
Favorable Principle
Unity Determination