期刊文献+

常用土方计算软件精度对比分析探讨 被引量:2

The discussion and comparative analysis on the accuracy of common earthwork calculation software
原文传递
导出
摘要 以榆林市榆阳区岔河则乡为研究区域,选取现阶段常用的CASS10.1、ArcGIS10.1、Surfer13、Civil 3D 2016和飞时达12.1五款土方计算软件,对土方计算结果进行对比分析。结果表明:五款软件通过三角网法计算的土方量基本相同,ArcGIS10.1和Surfer13的插值计算方法没有提高土方计算精度,原始数据的分布和密度能从根本上保证土方计算的精度;相对于基于CAD平台的软件(CASS10.1、Civil 3D 2016和飞时达12.1),基于地理信息系统的软件(ArcGIS10.1和Surfer13)数据处理速度快,可视化程度高,建模准确快速,从而使得土方计算变得更加快速准确。 Taking Chaheze township,Yuyang District,Yulin city as the study area,this paper analyzes the calculation results based on the five commonly earthwork calculation software,namely CASS10.1,ArcGIS 10.1,Surfer13,Civil 3 D 2016 and Fast TFT 12.1.the triangular network method is used to calculate earthwork.The results show that the precision of earthwork calculated by the above five software are basically the same.The interpolation calculation methods of ArcGIS 10.1 and Surfer 13 cannot improve the accuracy of earthwork calculation.The distribution and density of the original data can fundamentally guarantee the accuracy of earthwork calculation.Compared with earthwork calculation software(CASS10.1 Civil 3 D 2016 and FastTFT 12.1)based on the CAD platform,the geographic information system-based software(ArcGIS10.1 and Surfer13)has fast data processing speed,high visualization degree,accurate and fast modeling,etc.,thus making the earthwork calculation more rapid and accurate.
作者 王家峰 WANG Jiafeng(Land Surveying,Planning and Design Institute of Shaanxi Land Engineering Construction Group Co.,Ltd.,Xi'an 710075,China)
出处 《西部大开发(土地开发工程研究)》 2019年第12期17-21,共5页
关键词 土方计算 对比分析 三角网法 插值计算 高程点 earthwork calculation comparative analysis triangulation interpolation calculation elevation point
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献52

共引文献110

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部