完善认罪认罚案件中确定刑量刑建议合理性之措施——以重新审视该量刑建议性质为基础

Improving Measures to Determine the Rationality of Sentencing Recommendations in Cases of Confession and Punishment——Based on Re-examining the Nature of the Sentencing Recommendation

认罪认罚从宽制度中的确定刑量刑建议具有丰富内涵,其不只是控辩之"合意"及公诉权的组成部分,更是一种量刑活动结果之体现,取代了法官部分量刑自由裁量权。故为保障认罪认罚案件中确定刑量刑建议的合理性,应参照德国的刑事处罚令程序,允许法官介入到控辩协商过程,提高量刑建议的准确性;同时应强调诉讼各方当事人之有效参与,完善社会调查报告制度,确保检察机关能够充分接触各种量刑信息。此外应完善量刑指导意见、保障量刑建议生成过程的程序正当性,以期从多角度规范检察机关的自由裁量权,提高其精准量刑的能力。

The suggestion of determining penalty and sentencing in the leniency system of confession and punishment has rich connotation.It is not only a part of the"consensus"of the prosecution and defense and the right of public prosecution,but also the embodiment of the results of sentencing activities,replacing part of the discretion of the judge.Therefore,in order to ensure the rationality of the sentencing proposal in the case of guilty plea,we should refer to the procedure of criminal penalty order in Germany,and allow the judge to intervene in the negotiation process of prosecution and defense,so as to improve the accuracy of sentencing proposal.At the same time,we should emphasize the effective participation of all parties in the lawsuit,improve the social investigation report system,and ensure that the procuratorial organs can fully access to all kinds of sentencing information.In addition,we should improve the sentencing guidance and guarantee the procedural legitimacy of the sentencing proposal generation process,so as to regulate the discretion of the procuratorial organ from multiple angles and improve its ability of accurate sentencing.