期刊文献+

论国际投资仲裁中的现场勘验

On the On-Site Inspection in International Investment Arbitration
原文传递
导出
摘要 勘验是国际投资仲裁中的四种证据形式之一,这种证据形式具有自身的局限和优势。仲裁庭享有命令现场勘验的固有权力。在具体案件中是否运用现场勘验,仲裁庭享有广泛的自由裁量权,同时就具体勘验安排有义务与当事方协商;当事方在现场勘验中享有正当程序权利,也承担善意合作的义务。具体勘验涉及诸多事项,仲裁机构或国际组织应当加强相关国际软法的建设,仲裁庭和当事方应事先妥善筹划和安排,以实现预期的良好效果。 As one of the four forms of evidence in international investment arbitration,inspection has its own disadvantages and advantages.The tribunal has the inherent power to order on-site inspection.In specific cases,the tribunal has extensive discretion on whether to apply on-site inspection,while it has the obligation to negotiate with the parties on specific inspection arrangements.The parties enjoy the right of due process in the process of on-site inspection and the obligation of good faith to cooperate.The inspection may involve many matters.The arbitration institution or international organization should strengthen the establishment of relevant international soft law.The tribunal and the parties should plan and arrange various matters involved in the on-site inspection properly in advance,so as to achieve the expected effects.
作者 崔起凡
出处 《商事仲裁与调解》 2022年第2期25-38,共14页 Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
基金 浙江省社会科学规划项目(项目编号:18NDJC090YB)的阶段性成果之一
关键词 国际投资仲裁 现场勘验 正当程序 自由裁量 international investment arbitration on-site inspection due process discretion
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献41

  • 1Bryan A Garner.Black’s Law Dictionary. . 2004
  • 2Libananco Holdings Co.Limited v.The Republic of Turkey,ICSID Case No.ARB/06/8,Decisionon Preliminary Issues. . 2008
  • 3Chester Brown.??The Inherent Powers of International Courts and Tribunals(J)British Year Book of International Law . 2005 (1)
  • 4Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. V. United Republic of Tanzania. ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22 . 2006
  • 5SempraEnergy International v.The Argentine Republic. ICSID Case No.ARB/02/16 (US/Argentina BIT) . 2007
  • 6Repsol YPF Ecuador S.A.v.Empresa Estatal Petróleos del Ecuador (Petroecuador). ICSID Case No.ARB/01/10 . 2007
  • 7AGIP v.People’’s Republic of the Congo. ICSID Case No.ARI3/77/1 . 1979
  • 8Feldman v.Mexico. ICSID Case No.ARB (AF)/99/1 . 2000
  • 9Louis Henkin.How Nations Behave. Law and Foreign Policy . 1979
  • 10Brayan A.Garner.Black’’s Law Dictionary. . 2004

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部