期刊文献+

重建常态化WTO上诉机构:以《多方临时上诉仲裁安排》实施为契机 被引量:1

Reconstruction of the WTO Appellate Body in Normalization:Taking the Implementation of the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement as an Opportunity
原文传递
导出
摘要 美国持续阻挠世界贸易组织上诉机构法官遴选,致使其深陷"停摆"僵局之中。为应对这一全球经贸治理困境,且保证两审终审及有约束力的裁决能够有效执行,中国联合欧盟等世界贸易组织成员积极推动构建《多方临时上诉仲裁安排》。《多方临时上诉仲裁安排》基于《关于争端解决规则与程序的谅解》第25条设计,将争端解决的两种途径——上诉与仲裁结合在一起,实现了制度上的创新与发展。通过设置高效的制度性举措,不仅为上诉仲裁案件的裁决提供具体细化规则,而且对未来上诉机构的改革勇作尝试。我国积极推动构建并实施上诉仲裁机制,彰显了恢复多边贸易体制的信心与决心。一方面,在寻求长远解决危机的同时,通过该机制解决WTO当前所面临的上诉难问题;另一方面,以上诉仲裁安排为契机,未来各国间的合作更加密切,重建常态化WTO上诉机构已迈上快车道。 The United States continued to obstruct the WTO Appellate Body judge selection,causing it to fall into a"shutdown"deadlock.In response to this dilemma of global governance and trade,and to ensure that instance is final and binding ruling can effectively implement,China joint European Union and other WTO members to actively promote the construction of"Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangements".MPIA is designed on the basis of Article 25 of the DSU,and combines the two methods of dispute settlement mechanism-litigation and arbitration,which achieved institutional innovation and development.By providing efficient institutional initiatives,not only for the determination of appeals in arbitration cases specific and detailed rules,but also for the future improvement of the Appellate Body.China actively promotes the establishment and implementation of MPIA,demonstrating its confidence and determination to restore the multilateral trading system.On the one hand,while seeking a long-term solution to the crisis of the Appellate Body,try to solve the problem through this mechanism.On the other hand,taking the implementation of the MPIA as a development opportunity,In the future,the cooperation between countries will become closer,the rebuilding of the normalization of the WTO Appellate Body has taken the fast track.
作者 宋歌
出处 《商事仲裁与调解》 2021年第6期22-38,共17页 Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
关键词 WTO上诉机构 《多方临时上诉仲裁安排》 多边贸易体制 WTO Appellate Body Multi-party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement multilateral trading system
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献50

  • 1余敏友.论世贸组织法律救济的特性[J].现代法学,2006,28(6):14-24. 被引量:6
  • 2Richard Cappalli, Advanced Case Law methods: A Practical Guide, Transnational Publishers 2005, p:4.
  • 3Rupert Cross & J. W. Harris, Precedent in English Law, 4th edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1991, p:227.
  • 4Bryan A. Garner, Black's Law Dictionary, 8th edition, West 2004, p:1443.
  • 5William M. Lile et al. , Brief Making and the Use of Law Books 321 (3d ed. 1914). See Black's Law Dictionary, 8th, West, p:1443.
  • 6Peter Wesley- Smith: The Sources of Hong Kong Law, Hong Kong University Press 1994, p:30.
  • 7Michael Zander, The Law - making Process, 5th edition, Butterworths 1999, p :263.
  • 8K. N. Llewellyn, The Bramble Bush, Oceana Publications, INC., New York 1960, pp:41-42.
  • 9Michael Zander, The Law - making Process, 4th edition, Butterworths 1994, p:266, 269.
  • 10Midland Silicones Ltd. v. Scrutons Ltd. , [ 1962] AC 466, 466. See Rupert Cross & J. W. Harris, Precedent in English Law, 4th edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1991, p: 101.

共引文献64

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部