期刊文献+

仲裁禁诉令的合理性、可操作性及其在我国的应用前景 被引量:1

Anti-suit Injunctions in Arbitration:The Rationality,Operability and Its Potential Application in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 由于目前缺少对仲裁庭签发禁诉令的直接规定,很多仲裁庭只能在临时措施架下签发禁诉令。一方面来说,临时性的仲裁禁诉令更具有合理性,因为临时禁诉令既没有违反自裁管辖权原则,也没有完全剥夺当事人诉诸司法的权利。但是,另一方面来说,仲裁禁诉令似乎并不应该受到临时措施签发条件的约束,因为只要仲裁当事人之间已经达成排他性仲裁协议,仲裁庭就有权签发禁诉令,并不需要满足签发一般临时措施的条件。并且,临时禁诉令可能由于不满足"终局性"的要求而难以在法院承认与执行。目前,我国法院还没有承认与执行外国仲裁禁诉令的实践,但是在相关法律与实践的可操作空间下,以裁决形式作出的外国仲裁禁诉令在我国是有承认与执行的可能的。 With the absence of direct provisions for the issuance of anti-suit injunctions by arbitral tribunals,many arbitrators can only issue anti-suit injunctions in the framework of interim measures.On the one hand,the interim anti-suit injunction is more reasonable because it neither violates the principle of Competence-Competence nor completely deprives the parties of their right of access to justice.On the other hand,however,it does not appear that the anti-suit injunction should be subject to the conditions for the issuance of the interim measure,since the arbitral tribunal has the power to issue the injunction as long as there is an exclusive arbitration agreement between the parties to the arbitration.The conditions for issuing general interim measures are not required to be met.Moreover,it’s difficult for the interim injunction to be enforced in the national court because it may fail to meet the requirement of finality.At present,China’s courts have not enforced any foreign anti-suit injunction,but it is possible to enforce the foreign anti-suit injunction in the form of award within the relevant legal framework.
作者 翟颖
机构地区 北京师范大学
出处 《商事仲裁与调解》 2021年第5期117-131,共15页 Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
基金 中国法学会部级法学研究重点委托课题“孟晚舟案”与对美国长臂管辖的反制和阻断理论,体制和机制(项目批准号:CLS2019ZDWT12)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 国际商事仲裁 禁诉令 承认与执行 international commercial arbitration anti-suit injunctions recognition and enforcement
  • 相关文献

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部