仲裁裁决撤销事由中“违反法定程序”的法律适用——以64份撤销裁定书为样本的考察(下)

Application of Law in “Violation of Statutory Procedures” in the Grounds for Revocation of Arbitration Awards——A Survey Based on 64 Revocation Rulings as Samples Ⅱ

《仲裁法》第58条明确了申请撤销国内仲裁裁决的七种法定事由,但对这七种法定事由的解释,仲裁法学界和实务界仍存有一些争议。以中国裁判文书网上64份撤销裁定书为样本,对"违反法定程序"事由的适用情况进行考察发现:"违反法定程序"常被当事人滥用拖延执行、"违反法定程序"的认定标准尚不统一、仲裁员依法应当回避而未回避和送达程序瑕疵构成"违反法定程序"的主要原因。"违反法定程序"作为撤裁事由的目的在于保障当事人的基本程序权利,但其适用中存在的问题也表明这一事由有被滥用和异化之风险。要规避这一风险,离不开法院、仲裁机构、仲裁员以及当事人的共同努力和理念的更新。

Article 58 of the arbitration law specifies seven legal reasons for applying for the cancellation of domestic arbitral awards.However,there are still some disputes on the interpretation of these seven legal reasons in the field of Arbitration Law and practice.Taking 64 online revocation rulings of Chinese judicial documents as samples,this paper studies the application of“violation of legal procedure”causes.It is found that“violation of legal procedure”is often abused by the parties to delay the implementation,“violation of legal procedure”is not uniform,arbitrators who should avoid but not avoid in accordance with the law,and service procedure defects are the main reasons for“violation of legal procedure”.The purpose of“violation of legal procedure”as the reason for withdrawal of arbitration is to protect the basic procedural rights of the parties.However,the problems in its application show that this reason has the risk of abuse and alienation.To avoid this risk,it is necessary for the court,arbitration institutions,arbitrators and the parties to work together and update their ideas.