期刊文献+

认罪认罚从宽制度适用中的竞合问题研究 被引量:1

Research on Concurrence in the Application of Leniency System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 认罪认罚从宽制度与自首、坦白、刑事和解等制度存在竞合关系,这一现象有其复杂的形成原因。根据量刑情节是否发生于刑事司法程序中,可以划分为实体性量刑情节和程序性量刑情节,其中,程序性量刑情节所存在的体系不完善、立法经验缺乏以及理论界和实务界认识不足等问题是上述竞合现象发生的现实原因,但对同一程序性量刑事实双重评价问题的忽视才是根本原因。解决竞合问题的关键在于确立禁止双重评价原则,其必要性体现在保障被害人权益、贯彻责任主义的量刑原则、维护刑事法领域的价值统一和促进认罪认罚制度的规范化发展等四个方面。具体的适用途径包括限制减刑和划清界限,前者是基于现行立法条件的妥协措施,后者才是根本解决之道。 The system of leniency of confession and punishment is in concurrence with the system of voluntary surrender,confession and criminal reconciliation,which has its complicated causes.According to whether the circumstances of sentencing happen in criminal judicial procedure,we can divide them into substantive circumstances and procedural circumstances.Among them,imperfect system,lack of legislative experience and insufficient understanding of theoretical and practical circles are the realistic reasons for the above phenomenon.However,the double evaluation of the same procedural sentencing facts is ignored Seeing is the root cause.The key to solve the problem of concurrence lies in the establishment of the principle of prohibiting double evaluation.Its necessity is embodied in four aspects:protecting the rights and interests of victims,implementing the principle of sentencing responsibility,maintaining the unity of value in the field of criminal law,and promoting the standardized development of the system of confession and punishment.The former is a compromise measure based on the current legislative conditions,and the latter is the fundamental solution.
作者 葛军 彭俊 GE Jun;PENG Jun(Law school,Guilin University of Electronic Technology,Guilin 541004,China)
出处 《湖北工业职业技术学院学报》 2020年第5期54-59,共6页 Journal of Hubei Industrial Polytechnic
基金 桂林电子科技大学全面依法治校研究智库课题(GXGD018)
关键词 认罪认罚从宽制度 竞合 程序性量刑情节 禁止双重评价原则 leniency system concurrence procedural circumstance evaluation principle
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献103

  • 1熊秋红.废止劳教之后的法律制度建设[J].中国法律评论,2014(2):247-251. 被引量:9
  • 2陈效.日本检察审查会制度实施现状评析[J].人民检察,2014(7):69-71. 被引量:10
  • 3戴维·鲁本.法律现代主义[M].苏亦工,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004:428.
  • 4本杰明·N·卡多佐.法律的成长法律科学的悖论[M].董炯,彭冰,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2002.
  • 5H·科殷.法哲学[M].北京:华夏出版社,2003..
  • 6邱兴隆,许章润.刑罚学[M].北京:群众出版社,1998.259
  • 7乔治·恩德勒.经济伦理学大辞典[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2001..
  • 8城下裕二.量刑基准の研究[M].东京:成文堂,1995:133.
  • 9川崎一夫.体系的量刑论[M].东京:成文堂,1991:203.
  • 10曾根威彦.量刑基准[G]//西原春夫.日本刑事法的形成与特色.北京:法律出版社,东京:成文堂,1997:143.

共引文献732

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部