期刊文献+

肺康复训练对肺癌患者肺部感染、不良情绪、住院时间的影响 被引量:2

Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Training on Lung Infection,Adverse Mood and Hospitalization Time in Patients with Lung Cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析肺康复训练对肺癌患者肺部感染、不良情绪、住院时间的影响。方法选取2017年6月—2019年6月于四川省成都市第六人民医院就诊的86例肺癌患者,按电脑随机法分为观察组和对照组,各43例。对照组给予常规护理,观察组在其基础上实施肺康复训练,比较两组护理效果、肺部感染、患者不良情绪变化和住院时间变化。结果两组干预前FVC、FEV1和MVV水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后两组FVC、FEV1和MVV水平明显提高且观察组FVC、FEV1和MVV水平高于对照组(P<0.05);干预前两组SAS、SDS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后两组SAS、SDS均有所降低且观察组SAS、SDS评分低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率低于对照组且住院时间短于对照组(P<0.05);观察组满意率高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论在肺癌患者中给予肺康复训练对于改善患者肺功能,降低肺部感染,缩短住院时间以及缓解不良情绪等有重要作用。 Objective To analyze the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation training on lung infection,adverse mood and hospitalization time in patients with lung cancer.Methods Eighty-six patients with lung cancer who were admitted to the hospital from June 2017 to June 2019 were enrolled in the observation group and the control group,43 cases in each group.The control group received routine nursing,and the observation group performed pulmonary rehabilitation training on the basis of the two groups.The nursing effect,lung infection,adverse emotional changes and hospitalization time were compared.Results There was no significant difference in the levels of FVC,FEV1 and MVV between the two groups before intervention(P>0.05).The levels of FVC,FEV1 and MVV were significantly increased in the two groups after intervention and the levels of FVC,FEV1 and MVV in the observation group were higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the scores of SAS and SDS between the two groups before intervention(P>0.05).The SAS and SDS of the two groups were decreased after the intervention,and the SAS and SDS scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of complication was lower than that of the control group and the hospital stay was shorter than that of the control group(P<0.05).The satisfaction rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Pulmonary rehabilitation training in patients with lung cancer plays an important role in improving lung function,reducing lung infection,shortening hospital stay and alleviating adverse emotions.
作者 刘晓霞 LIU Xiaoxia(Sichuan Sixth People's Hospital of Chengdu,Chengdu 610051,China)
出处 《实用心脑肺血管病杂志》 2020年第S01期237-240,共4页 Practical Journal of Cardiac Cerebral Pneumal and Vascular Disease
关键词 肺康复训练 肺癌 不良情绪 住院时间 满意度 Pulmonary rehabilitation training Lung cancer Adverse emotions Hospitalization time Satisfaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献75

  • 1徐晓阳.有氧运动的健身价值研究进展[J].体育学刊,2004,11(5):52-54. 被引量:40
  • 2刘刚,吴莪如.呼吸肌疲劳诊断及治疗进展[J].现代医学,2004,32(6):351-354. 被引量:13
  • 3潘友民,潘铁成,张良华,汤应雄,周雁荣.呼吸训练改善肺癌患者手术后肺功能和生存质量的临床研究[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2005,27(9):548-550. 被引量:26
  • 4吴一龙,蒋国梁,廖美琳,周清华,陆舜,王绿化,张力,无.非小细胞肺癌孤立性转移处理共识[J].循证医学,2007,7(2):109-111. 被引量:22
  • 5Jemal A,Bray F,Center MM,et al.Global cancer statistics[J].CA-Cancer J Clin,2011,61(2):69-90.
  • 6Stamatelopoulos A,Kadjianis F,Zoganas L.Nonsmall cell lung cancer pulmonary parenchyma resection in lung-compromised patients[J].J BUO,2009,14(2):183-188.
  • 7Benzo R,Kelley GA,Recchi L,et al.Complications of lung resection a exercise capacity:a meta-analysis[J].Respir Med,2007,101(8):1790-1797.
  • 8Moller A,sartipy U.Long-term health-related quality of life following surgerg for lung cancer[J].Eur J Cardiothorac surg,2012,4(12):362-367.
  • 9Maringwa JT,Quinten C,King M,et al.Minimal important differences for interpreting health related quality of life scores from the RORTC-QLQ-C30in lung cancer patients partcipating in randomized controlled trials[J].Support Care Cancer,2011,19(11):1753-1760.
  • 10Ries ALB,Bauldoff GS,Carlin BW,et al.Pulmonary rehabilitation:Joint ACCP/AACVPR EvidenceBased Clinical Practice Guidelines[J].Chest,2007,131(5Suppl):41-42.

共引文献1103

同被引文献24

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部