摘要
2019年11月18日,Nature Chemistry上发表综述文章,认为目前对学术实验室安全的研究未成体系,缺乏关于安全态度和行为变化的必要数据,呼吁应开展系统性的调研以明确实验室安全教育和管理所存在的核心问题。该文从以上文章所指出问题的角度,梳理了实验室安全体系及世界一流大学常规做法;从安全理论和方法论两个视角分析了当前体系下,应对新时代的高校实验室安全挑战的着眼点和着手点;对比清华大学及哈佛大学等高校,深入探讨从加强行为安全与实现多学科共同参与这两个方向上着手的可行性。
A review article published in Nature Chemistry on Nov.18,2019,holds that the current research on the safety of academic laboratories is not systematic,and there is the lack of necessary data on the change of safety attitude and behavior,and it calls for the systematic research to clarify the core problems of laboratory safety education and management.From the viewpoint of the problems pointed out in the above article,this paper discusses the laboratory safety system and the world’s first-class universities’conventional practices,and from the perspective of safety theory and methodology,it analyzes the focusing points and starting points of the current safety system to deal with the new era challenges for university laboratory safety.In comparison between Tsinghua University and Harvard University,etc.,this paper talks about the feasibility of strengthening behavioral safety and realizing multi-disciplinary participation.
作者
黄开胜
艾德生
江轶
吴丹
HUANG Kaisheng;AI Desheng;JIANG Yi;WU Dan(Office of Laboratory Management,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China;School of Life Sciences,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)
出处
《实验技术与管理》
CAS
北大核心
2020年第1期3-9,共7页
Experimental Technology and Management
关键词
实验室安全
行为安全
多学科共同参与
laboratory safety
behavioral safety
multi-disciplinary participation