驳郭沫若史学在台港地区遭遇的贬损——以马彬、许冠三和金达凯为例

Refuting the Disparagement of Guo Moruo’s Historiography in Taiwan and Hong Kong:Taking Ma Bin,Xu Guansan and Jin Dakai as Examples

马彬、许冠三和金达凯,分别出版《郭沫若批判》《新史学九十年》《郭沫若总论》,贬损郭沫若史学。他们的手法有:片面利用大陆学者评郭沫若史学的言论;转换语境,放大郭沫若的"错误";且许冠三书中文献注释有误,金达凯严重抄袭王锦厚。造成这些现象的原因是文献不足和意识形态的影响。

Ma bin,Xu Guansan and Jin Dakai,respectively published Criticism of Guo Moruo,The New History for Ninety Years and An Introduction to Guo Moruo,to disparage Guo Moruo’s historiography.They used mainland scholars’one-sided remarks on Guo Moruo’s historiography,and changed the context to enlarge Guo Moruo’s"mistakes".Besides,there are errors in the notes of Xu Guansan’s book,while Jin Dakai plagiarizes many parts of Wang Jinhou’s article.These phenomena are caused by lack of literature and the influence of ideology.