激进抑或中庸:家庭抗逆力的属性争论与本土延展

Radical or Moderate:Debate on the Attributes and Local Extension of Family Resilience

作为新的应对危机的社会服务框架,家庭抗逆力理论提供多样态的正面架构,将服务视角从缺陷为本转向能力为本,其内涵深受文化要素的影响。基于概念的运用与实践,中国本土有了诸多的探索。但是立足实践,围绕文化处境对概念的属性和内涵进行深度拓展的研究不足,这对家庭抗逆力提升与扩展的研究与实践提出了新的走向。本研究立足本土的调查与实践,发现残疾人家庭的应对智慧为家庭抗逆力的属性争论提供了新的实证支持数据,并将家庭抗逆力理论放置于中国文化处境中进行一定程度的延展,从家庭抗逆力的“家庭”再解读、家庭抗逆力的本土“力”文化和家庭抗逆力的本土“过程”三个角度进行家庭抗逆力的本土文化对话,以提升概念的解释性与可行性。本研究发现,与西方家庭抗逆力的激进思维不同,家庭抗逆力在本土呈现一种中庸形态。

As a new social service framework for responding to crises,the family resilience theory provides a diverse and positive framework that shifts the service perspective from defect-based to capability-based,and its connotation is deeply influenced by cultural factors.Based on the applications of the concept,there have been many explorations in China in this field.However,studies are insufficient on the in-depth expansion of the attributes and connotations of the concept around the cultural sittings,which yields a new trend of research and practice on family resilience.The practice wisdom of families with disabilities provides new empirical data for the debate on the attributes of family resilience.This study is based on local investigations and practices,and the theory of family resilience is applied in the context of Chinese culture for a certain degree of extension.In this paper,the author analyzes the issue from three perspectives:the reinterpretation of the“family”of family resilience,the local“force”culture of family resilience,and the native“process”of family resilience,the local cultural dialogue of family resilience is carried out to enhance the interpretability and feasibility of the concept.This study shows that,unlike the radical thinking of Western family resilience,family resilience presents a moderate form in the local area.