论《四库全书总目》对胡安国《春秋传》的批评

On the Criticism of Hu Anguo’s Chun Qiu Zhuan in Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu

胡安国《春秋传》(以下简称胡传)问世以后,在经学史上产生了深远的影响。元明两代被悬为科举功令,遂流行天下,由此产生大量以胡传为去取的《春秋》著作及科举读本。独尊胡传给经学发展造成不少负面影响,导致深文刻酷的解经风气。四库提要从汉学的立场对胡传进行了广泛的检讨,其中以夏时周月辨最为典型地映照出汉宋学术的分野。对于夷夏之辨这一《春秋》要义,在胡传及整个《春秋》类提要中虽没有出现,却从“不书之书”的角度,体现了四库馆臣的复杂心态。

Since the publication of Chun Qiu Zhuan by Hu Anguo,it has a profound influence on the history of Confucian classics.The Yuan and Ming Dynasties were suspended as imperial examination merit orders,so they became popular all over the world,resulting in a large number of Chun Qiu Zhuan and imperial examination readings based on Hu Zhuan.The unique respect for Hu’s biography has caused a lot of negative effects on the development of Confucian classics,leading to the deep and cool style of interpreting Confucian classics.Si Ku synopsis makes a comprehensive review of Hu’s biography from the standpoint of Sinology,among which the distinction between Xia Dynasty and Zhou Dynasty is the most typical one.Although the essence of Chun Qiu Zhuan,the distinction between Yi and Xia,does not appear in Hu’s biography and the whole spring and Autumn Annals,it reflects the complex mentality of the officials of the Siku library from the perspective of"no book".