期刊文献+

基于三方博弈的被动式住宅市场主体行为研究 被引量:4

Research on the Subject Behavior of the Passive Housing Market Based on the Tripartite Game
下载PDF
导出
摘要 推进被动式住宅规模化发展是实现建筑业可持续发展、全面落实绿色发展观的重要举措。基于演化博弈理论,构建政府-开发商-购房者三方博弈模型,分析政府"激励"+"惩罚"策略主导下主体行为演化过程及稳定策略,探讨政府被动监管的边界问题,并对演化结果进行仿真分析。研究结果显示:在推进被动式住宅发展过程中,政府被动监管边界与社会效益以及不合作违约金有直接关系,但在发展成熟期,政府在充分考虑投入-产出比后将不再干预,更倾向于由市场发挥调节作用;开发商与购房者行为偏好更大程度上取决于自身获利的大小。政府应从加强节能认证、调整补贴额度、完善惩罚机制、构建信用体系、提高居住质量5个方面来推进被动式住宅规模化发展。 The scale development of passive housing is an important measure to realize the sustainable development of construction industry and to implement the concept of green development in an all-round way.By establishing a tripartite evolutionary game model in consideration of government′s"incentive"+"punishment"double intervention and information asymmetry,the relationship among government,developers and consumers is analyzed,the boundary of administrative control is also discussed.A study is given to emulate the interrelationships among action,evolutionary path,evolutionary stable strategy and boundary of government passive supervision in the end.The results show that,the government′s passive supervision boundary has a direct relationship with social benefits and incremental tax revenue,but the government isn′t more inclined to interfere after fully considering the input-output ratio,and the development will tend to rely on market regulation in the mature period of development.A greater extent they gain determines the behavioral preferences of developers and customers.The government should strengthen energy conservation labeling,adjust the subsidy amount,perfect the punishment mechanism,construct credit system and improve living quality to promote the large-scale development of passive housing.
作者 王志强 刘硕 张樵民 WANG Zhiqiang;LIU Shuo;ZHANG Qiaomin(School of Management Engineering,Qingdao University of Technology,Qingdao 266520,China;Smart City Construction Management Research Center(New Think Tank),Qingdao 266520,China;School of Civil and Transportation Engineering,Henan University of Urban Construction,Pingdingshan 467036,China)
出处 《沈阳建筑大学学报(社会科学版)》 2020年第5期485-493,共9页 Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University:Social Science
基金 山东省重点研发计划(软科学项目)一般项目(2019RKB01459)
关键词 被动式住宅 三方博弈 主体行为 被动监管 passive house tripartite game subject behavior passive supervision
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献119

  • 1李明,刘应宗.绿色技术发展的外部经济性及其补偿研究[J].西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版),2006,16(2):56-61. 被引量:7
  • 2张志勇,姜涌.从生态设计的角度解读绿色建筑评估体系——以CASBEE、LEED、GOBAS为例[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2006,28(4):29-33. 被引量:25
  • 3王洪涛,李风亭,徐冉.绿色建筑评估体系与节水[J].中国给水排水,2007,23(2):99-102. 被引量:6
  • 4姚先国.中国劳动力市场演化与政府行为[J].公共管理学报,2007,4(3):13-21. 被引量:21
  • 5Zhonghua Gou,Deo Prasad,Stephen Siu-Yu Lau.Are green buildings more satisfactory and comfortable?[J].Habitat International.2013
  • 6M.H. Issa,J.H. Rankin,A.J. Christian.Canadian practitioners’ perception of research work investigating the cost premiums, long-term costs and health and productivity benefits of green buildings[J].Building and Environment.2010(7)
  • 7Raymond J. Cole,John Robinson,Zosia Brown,Meg O’shea.Re-contextualizing the notion of comfort[J].Building Research & Information.2008(4)
  • 8Adrian Leaman,Bill Bordass.Are users more tolerant of ’green’ buildings?[J].Building Research & Information.2007(6)
  • 9Andrew Horsley,Chris France,Barry Quatermass.Delivering energy efficient buildings: a design procedure to demonstrate environmental and economic benefits[J].Construction Management and Economics.2003(4)
  • 10WEIBULL J W. Evolutionary game theory [ M ]. Cambridge: The MIT, 1995.

共引文献195

同被引文献38

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部