摘要
标准必要专利在我国移动通讯领域发展的背景下愈加重要,此前我国法院已经审理了多起标准必要专利案件,但我国的禁令救济实施规则不甚完善,由此引发的探讨不绝于耳,如何建立禁令救济裁判规则使其更好地服务于标准必要专利是当下应重点考虑的问题。本文将从我国的标准必要专利禁令救济典型案件"西电捷通诉索尼案"以及"华为诉三星案"入手分析我国目前司法体系与立法体系,通过借鉴域外司法实践,探讨建立以公众利益为核心、以过错责任原则为侵权判定原则的我国标准必要专利禁令救济裁判规则的建立,以期为我国司法领域在解决相关问题上带来更多思考。
Standard essential patents are becoming increasingly important in the field of mobile communication in China.The courts in China have heard many standard necessary patent cases,but the implementation rules of injunction relief is not good enough.How to establish injunction relief referee rules to make it better serve the standard essential patents is the priority at present.This paper makes the analysis of China’s current justice system and legislative system by referring to the typical standard-essential patent injunction relief cases in China,including"Xidian Jietong v.Sony"and"Huawei v.Samsung",and discusses the establishment of China’s standard essential patent injunction relief adjudication rules with the public interests as the core and fault liability as the principle of infringement determination,which are expected to inspire more thoughts on solving related issues in the judicial field.
作者
高敏
薛晓月
GAO Min;XUE Xiao-yue(School of Cyber Security and Information Law,Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications)
出处
《标准科学》
2021年第3期30-35,46,共7页
Standard Science
关键词
标准必要专利
专利侵权
禁令救济
FRAND原则
standard essential patent
patent infringement
injunctive relief
FRAND requirement principle