西方学者对人类命运共同体的认知和评介

Western Scholars’ Cognition and Comments on the Community with Shared Future for Mankind

从美、欧、日等西方国家学者的研究和评论来看,他们普遍认为人类命运共同体是中国崛起后的战略表达,所倡导的全球治理体系改革将会对现行的国际秩序造成冲击。一些学者对人类命运共同体蕴含的中国文化和全球治理观进行了意识形态解构,认为中国正在挑战西方主导的全球治理体制,并试图将国际秩序中国化。基于以上两方面,西方学者对中国构建人类命运共同体的态度出现分化,或反对,或支持,或主张容纳。西方学者的诠释和态度对于我们如何将人类命运共同体从"中国话语"发展成为世界话语,使之在不同的话语体系、思想环境和文化背景下形成相对稳定的共识,具有重要的参考意义。

According to the studies and comments of scholars from the United States,Europe,Japan and other western countries,they generally believe that the community with shared future for mankind is the strategic expression after the rise of China,and the reform of the global governance system advocated by them will impact the existing international order.Some scholars have deconstructed the ideology of Chinese culture and global governance embodied in the community with shared future for mankind,believing that China is challenging the western-dominated global governance system and trying to make the international order sinofied.Based on the above two aspects,western scholars’attitudes towards China’s construction of a community with shared future for mankind are divided,either opposing,supporting or advocating accommodation.The interpretation and attitude of western scholars are of great reference significance to how we develop the community with shared future for mankind from"Chinese discourse"to world discourse and form a relatively stable consensus under different discourse systems,ideological environments and cultural backgrounds.