从陆懋修形象看清代寒温之争的历史与记忆

Reviewing the History and Memory of the Controversy between Cold and Warm Disease in the Qing Dynasty from the Image of Lu Maoxiu

以伤寒学派与温病学派的论争书写温病学说史,实际上是现代中医界对清代医学史的一种记忆,并非历史的实情。从历史情景来看,被今人视为伤寒学派代表人物的陆懋修,并没有学派观念,反而反对医学的门户之见。他对叶桂等人温病学说的批评,其实是通过批驳邪说,重建医统,维护仲景全知全能的圣人形象。他的心理是作仲景传人,超凡入圣。在清代医学文化中,无论是陆懋修的严厉措辞,还是心理观念,并非个例,而是一种比较普遍的现象。

Writing the history of the doctrine of warm disease based on the controversy between the cold damage school and the school of warm disease is actually a kind of memory of the medical history of the Qing Dynasty by the modem Chinese medicine circle,not the fact of history.Judging from the historical situation,Lu Maoxiu,who was regarded as a representative of the cold disease School,did not have a school concept,but opposed the school views of medicine.His criticism of Ye Gui and others’warm disease doctrine was actually through refuting heresy,rebuilding medical traditions,and maintaining the image of Zhongjing’s omnipotent and all-powerful saint.His mentality was to be a descendant of Zhongjing,transcendence and sanctificatioa In the medical culture of the Qing Dynasty,whether it was Lu Maoxiu’s harsh words or psychological concepts.it was not an isolated case,but a relatively common phenomenon.