期刊文献+

走出“教学科研化”陷阱——兼论“教学学术”的本义与异化 被引量:4

Deviating from Paradox of “Performance-based Teaching Academic”:Identification and Alienation of “Scholarship of Teaching”
原文传递
导出
摘要 "教学学术"理念的提出,确证了教学作为一种研究性实践的学术本质和意蕴,也间接提出了对教学进行学术研究的合理性议题,为弥合大学教学与科研的对峙和冲突提供了另一种可能性。但是,确认大学教学的"学术属性",并不意味着把大学教学视同于学术事务。简单借用、套用科研管理和激励的方案来管理和评估教学,容易导致教学本质异化和"教学学术"原初理念偏离的双重困局。"教学科研化"的解构,既需要重塑大学的教学文化和教师的责任伦理,也需要作为行动者的大学教师在日常化的教学实践中谨守"教学学术"的边界,让大学教学回归德性实践的本质,真正成为一种传播知识的"教的学术"。 The scholarship of teaching has developed into a concept of considerable popularity in higher education.It is in the development of an engaged pedagogy and collaborative teaching practice.The rise of the concept do rebalance the mission of larger academic institutions that have traditionally emphasized research over teaching and service.Although the scholarship of teaching mirrors the promotion and tenure decisions,the reward structure still cannot produce good teaching may be expected.A paradox of promoting the scholarship of teaching has formed for simply applying performance-based research to evaluate teaching.The"The Alienation of teaching academic"is deviated from"the scholarship of teaching"and teaching academies has been misdirected.The deconstruction of"Performance-based Teaching Academic"should not only reshaping the University’s teaching culture but also emphasis on the faculty’s responsibility ethics.The"teaching scholarship"would be reached by the faculties adhering to the boundaries of"scholarship of teaching"in their teaching practice.
作者 孙元涛 李侠 Sun Yuantao;Li Xia(College of Education,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058)
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第5期62-68,共7页 Research in Educational Development
基金 教育部一般规划基金项目“大学教学激励机制生成机理与优化路径研究”(19YJA880025)的部分成果.
关键词 教学学术 教学科研化 结构-行动 异化 责任伦理 the scholarship of teaching performance-based teaching academic structure-action alienation responsibility ethics
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献24

  • 1王玉衡.试论大学教学学术运动[J].外国教育研究,2005,32(12):24-29. 被引量:111
  • 2王玉衡.美国大学教学学术运动[J].清华大学教育研究,2006,27(2):84-90. 被引量:65
  • 3[美]欧内斯特·L博耶.关于美国教育改革的演讲[Z].涂艳国,方彤译.北京:教育科学出版社,2003.74-78,78.
  • 4茶珊珊.论大学教师的教学学术性[D].长沙:湖南大学硕士论文.2005:21.
  • 5Randy Bass. The Scholarship of Teaching: What's the Problem? [EB/OL]. http: www. doiit. gmu. edu/Archives/feb98/rbass. htm, 2005 - 05 - 24.
  • 6L Vuillar. Reflective Teaching [ A]. L Anderson. International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education [ C ]. Elsevier Science Ltd, 1995:178- 183.
  • 7Lee Shulman. From Minsk to Pinsk: Why a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning? [ J ]. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2000,1 ( 1 ) : 48 53.
  • 8Ernest L.Boyer.Scholarship Reconsidered:Priorities for the Professoriate[R].CarnegieFoundation for the Advancement of Teaching,Princeton,NJ,1990:24.
  • 9Pat Hutchings,Lee Shulman.The Scholarship of Teaching:New Elaborations,New Devel-opments[J].Change,1999,31(5):10-15.
  • 10Lee Shulman.From Minsk to Pinsk:why a scholarship of teaching and learning[J].Jour-nal of Scholarship in Teaching and Learning,2000,1(1),48-53.

共引文献109

同被引文献68

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部