超越物债区分原则:论作为财产支配权的网络虚拟财产权

在数字经济勃兴的时代背景下,出于主观权利理论与社会现实需求的双重考虑,就网络虚拟财产定位而言,应当放弃具有一定实益的关系范式与契合教义体系的利益范式,继续恪守权利范式以实现网络虚拟财产的权利化。由于网络虚拟财产权物权说等网络虚拟财产权理论在网络虚拟财产权构造方面有所不足,故而仍须加以反思与补正。在损益学界既有学说的基础上,或许可以考虑分离网络服务合同与网络虚拟财产,将网络虚拟财产別除于网络用户债权效力之外,并且区分“物权所有权”与“非为物权的网络虚拟财产所有权”,继而以网络虚拟财产所有权为中心构造网络虚拟财产权概念及其规则体系。此外,尽管作为网络虚拟财产权客体的网络虚拟财产具有数据属性,但网络虚拟财产却不同于一般数据。被排除在网络虚拟财产范围之外的数据,则可以借由数据权益、人格权或者个人信息保护规则获得妥当的法律保护。

In terms of the positioning of network virtual property in the context of the development of the digital economy,the relational paradigm with certain benefits and the interest paradigm that fits the system of legal dogmatics should be abandoned for the sake of both subjective rights theory and social reality needs,and the rights paradigm should be adhered to.Appealing to the theory of right in rem or some other theories is inadequate in the construction of network virtual property rights.Based on the existing theories,perhaps we can consider separating network service contract and network virtual property,exclude network virtual property from the validity of network users'claims(creditor's right),and distinguish between“ownership of tangible things”and“ownership of network virtual property”,and then the concept of network virtual property rights and its rule system are constructed with the ownership of network virtual property as the center.In addition,although the network virtual property has the nature of data,it is different from the general data.At the same time,data that is excluded from the scope of network virtual property can obtain reasonable legal protection in accordance with data rights,personality rights,or personal information protection rules.