台湾后殖民文学史书写的问题与批判

Issues and Criticism of the Writing of Postcolonial Literature History of Taiwan

20世纪90年代台湾文化场域引进的后殖民理论,产生了大量以后殖民为视角的文学史著,对于台湾文学史书写具有重要的影响。虽然后殖民的去殖民、去中心的立场有助于批判和反思台湾社会内部性别、族群、殖民历史等领域中权力关系不平等的问题,但这一去殖民的文化论述却被泛绿"本土派"学者收编,演变成为所谓的"去中国化"的理论工具,它并非是对台湾过往殖民历史的一个反思和清理,而是在泛绿"本土派"学者有意引导之下的一场借"后殖民"来建构所谓"台湾主体性"的运动,体现了台湾90年代"本土化运动"对台湾历史诠释权的争夺。清理台湾后殖民文学史书写的现象与问题,有助于我们厘清台湾社会精神的分裂与危机。

The postcolonial theory introduced into Taiwan’s cultural field in the 1990 s has produced a large number of literature history writings from the perspective of postcolonialism,which have an important influence on the writing of literature history of Taiwan.Although the post colonial position of de colonization and de centralism is conducive to criticize and reflect on the inequality of power relations in the fields of gender,indigenous people and colonial history in Taiwan society,this cultural discourse of de colonization has been incorporated by the natives and evolved into a theoretical tool of"de Sinicization".It is not reflection or clean-up of Taiwan’s past colonial history,it is a movement to construct the so-called"Taiwan subjectivity"with the help of"postcolonial"under the intentional guidance of local scholars,which reflects the struggle of Taiwan’s"localization movement"for the right to interpret Taiwan’s history in the 1990 s.Clearing up the phenomena and problems in the writing of postcolonial literature history of Taiwan will help us to clarify the split and crisis of Taiwan’s social spirit.