宪法权利有位阶吗?

Is There a Hierarchy of Constitutional Rights?

对确定性的追求令部分学者将权利位阶视为权利冲突的理想解决方案。宪法权利有时会彼此冲突,但现有的判例和法理并不足以支撑权利位阶论。从内部来看,权利位阶论混淆了个案适用与抽象原则、说理论证与宪法解释、价值与权利。从外部来看,权利位阶论背离了人权不可分割的理念,也偏离了成文宪法对多重价值的追求。权利位阶论在理论上无法自圆其说,在实践中亦为各国司法界所否弃。走出权利冲突的两难,可循事后的司法解决,即个案中的法益权衡,亦可考虑事先的立法解决,即设定权利边界和冲突解决规则。

principles,of rhetorical argumentation with constitutional interpretation,of values and interests with rights.On the other hand,the hierarchy of constitutional rights doctrine runs counter to the indivisibility of human rights and departs from the original intention of a written constitution.The claim of a hierarchy of constitutional rights is untenable and rejected by the judiciary across the globe.Resolution of rights conflict can be reached via ex-post judicial way,i.e.,balancing of competing interests,or ex-ante legislative route,i.e.,setting rights boundaries and general rules.