《千金要方》宋校本与新雕本食疗本草文献异文概述

An Overview of Textual Difference in Dietetic Materia Medica Chapters in Song’s Edition and Xindiao’s Edition of Qian Jin Yao Fang (Invaluable Prescriptions)

通过比对《千金要方》宋校本与新雕本食疗本草文献部分的异文,归纳其版本差异,发现食疗本草文献在两版本的所在卷数、卷名、篇名不同,宋校本迁移与调整顺序15处,乙转倒文12处,增、删、改换文字388处,规范调整术语“主”的使用90处等。比对结果的分析显示,宋校本食疗本草文献较新雕本行文更加精当、准确、通顺,便于检索和使用,强化了《千金要方》的临床实用性,但尚有疏漏以及理校与径改之处。两版本的差异反映了某些学术认识上的历史变化。这些异文有待结合唐宋时期本草、方书文献进行更加详实全面的考证。

The textual differences in dietetic materia medica chapters were compared in the two editions of Qian Jin Yao Fang(Invaluable Prescriptions),i.e.,Song’s edition(printed in the third year of Zhiping period of the Northern Song Dynasty by Office of Revising Medical Books)and Xindiao’s edition(the popular edition before official block printing of the Northern Song Dynasty).The results showed that the differences were presented in volume number,volume name and chapter titles,and there were 15 items having been rearranged,12 words or phrases having been reversed,388 words or characters having been added,deleted or revised,and 90 wordings of the terminology“主(Zhu)”having been standardized.The comparative results indicated that the dietetic materia medica chapters in Song’s edition appears to be more precise,accurate and coherent compared with that in Xindiao’s edition,which is beneficial to index and easier use,and enhances its application in clinical practices.However,Song’s edition still has some errors and omissions need to be researched or revised in the future.The differences existing in the two versions reflect the historic changes in the aspect of some academic understandings,and need to be investigated in details with the help of textual research of the literatures of herbal medicines and prescriptions in Tang and Song dynasties.