怀德堂朱子学之变迁——五井兰洲与中井竹山

A Change of the KaitokudoNeo-Confucianism:GoiRanshu and NakaiChikuzan

本文分析怀德堂朱子学者的两位代表人物五井兰洲(1697-1762)以及中井竹山(1730-1804)针对暗斋学派与徂徕学派的批判及其背景。明确了兰洲的名分论是自他认识与国内秩序双方面的道德性实践问题,而竹山的名分论则变成有关国内秩序与"文"的问题,并且竹山试图通过以"文"内包"道德"的形式来达成二者的一体化。"文"的崛起不仅限于竹山,可以说是18世纪后叶的一个特征。

This article examinesGoiRanshu五井兰洲(1697-1762)and NakaiChikuzan中井竹山(1730-1804)’s criticism of the Kimon崎門school and the Sorai徂徠school and also their philosophical background.Both of them based on Meibun名分(moral obligations of character)thought.Ranshu interpreted it as the issues of moral practice about national identities and domestic political order.Nevertheless,Chikuzan emphasized that Meibun was the political and moralistic rulesreflected in Chinese composition and discussed by Japanese people.Thus,Chikuzan changed Meibun to a literary problem.The rise of Bun文(literature)was not only athought of Chikuzan,but also a salient feature of Japanese intellectual history in late eighteenth-century.