2CARPENTER M A , GELETKANYCZ M A , SANDERSW G . Upper echelons research revisited: antecedents, ele-ments, and consequences of top m-anagement team composi-tion[J]. Journal of Manage-ment,2004,30(6) : 749-778.
3HAMBRICK D C,MASON P A . Upper echelon:the orga-nizationas a reflection of its top managers[J], Academy ofManagement Review, 1984,9(2).
4HAMBRICK?DONALD C. Top management groups:a con-ceptual integration and reconsideration of the team label[J].In Staw,B. M. and Cumming L. L. (Eds),Research in Or-ganizational Behavior ,1994(16).
5YASEMIN Y KOR. Direct and interaction effects of topmanagement team and board compositions on R&-D invest-ment strategy [J]. Strategic Management Journey , 2006(27):1 081-1 099.
6CARPENTER M A ,SANDERS W G. The effects of topmanagement team pay and firm internationalization on MNCperformance[J]. Journal of Management, 2004,30 (4):509-528.
7BLESA A, RIPOLLESM. The role of market orientation in, the relationship between entrep reneurial proactiveness andperformance [J]. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 2003(12):1-19.
8FINKELSTEIN, S, HAMBRICK D C. Top managementteam tenure and organizational outcomes; the moderatingrole of managerial discretion [ J ]. Administrative ScienceQuarterly, 1990(8).
9HAMBRICK,DONALD C,D'AVENI,RICHARD A, Topmanagement deterioration as part of the downward spiral oflarge corporate bankruptcies [ J ]. Management Science,1992,38(10).
10ELRON E. Top management teams within multinationalcorporations ? effects of cultural heterogeneity [J]. Leader-ship Quarterly, 1997,8(4) : 393-412.
