期刊文献+

基于韦伯模式的课程标准与试题一致性分析——以青海师范大学高等数学课程期终试卷为例

Consistency analysis of curriculum standards and exam questions based on weber model——Take the final exam paper of advanced mathematics of Qinghai Normal University as an example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 韦伯一致性分析模式是判断与评价课程标准一致性的重要工具.通过对高等数学课程教学大纲和三年的期终试题编码,从韦伯评价模式的四个维度知识类别、知识深度、知识广度、知识分布平衡性,对教学大纲与试题进行了一致性分析,得到:试卷的导数试题与教学大纲一致性最好,不定积分试题与教学大纲一致性相对较低,极限试题和导数应用试题分别在知识广度维度和知识类别维度需做调整,这为科学地命制试卷提供了依据. The Weber consistency analysis model is an important tool for judging and evaluating the consistency of curriculum standards.The evaluation model consists of four standards:knowledge category,knowledge depth,knowledge breadth and knowledge distribution balance.The consistency is judged by the acceptable level of the four standards.Consistency analysis is helpful for the analysis and improvement of the achievement of higher education curriculum goals.This paper uses the Weber model to analyze the consistency between the syllabus and the final exam paper of the“Advanced Mathematics”course,so as to provide a reference for ensuring the teaching quality of the course.
作者 贾秀芹 赵青林 JIA Xiu-qin;ZHAO Qing-lin(College of Mathematics and Statistics,Qinghai Normal University,Xining 810016,China;Research Student Academy,Qinghai Normal University,Xining 810008,China)
出处 《青海师范大学学报(自然科学版)》 2022年第1期79-86,共8页 Journal of Qinghai Normal University(Natural Science Edition)
关键词 一致性 韦伯模式 教学大纲 高等数学 consistency Weber model syllabus advanced mathematics
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献15

  • 1No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).450.
  • 2Blank, R. (2002). Models for Alignment Analysis and As- sistance to States. Council of Chief State School Officers Summary Document. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Ot/icers.2.
  • 3Webb, N.L. (1997). Criteria for Alignment of Expectations and Assessments in Mathematics and Science Education (Council of Chief State School Oteers and National Insti- tute for Science Education Research Monograph No. 6). Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for E- ducation Researeh.l-38./Webb, N. L. (2002). Alignment Study in Language Arts, Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies of State Standards and Assessments for Four States. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. 1-66.
  • 4http://wat.wceruw.org/2011-09-10.
  • 5Porter, A. C. (2002, October). Measuring the Content of In- struction: Uses in Research and Practice. Educational Re- searcher, 31(7): 3-14.
  • 6Porter, A., Smithson, J., Blank, R., & Zeidner, T. (2007/This Issue). Alignment as a Teacher Variable. Applied Measure- ment in Education, 20:27-51.
  • 7Lauren B. Resnick, Robert Rothman, Jean B. Slattery and Jennifer L. Vranek. Benchmarking and Alignment of Stan- dards and Testing. Educational Assessment, 9(1&2): 1 -27.
  • 8Subkoviak, M. J. (1988). A Practitioner's Guide to Compu- tation and Interpretation of Reliability Indices for Mastery Tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25:47-55.
  • 9王磊,黄琼,刘东方.中考命题与化学课程标准的一致性研究——基于九省市中等学校招生考试概念原理知识的比较[J].基础教育课程,2010(3):75-80. 被引量:23
  • 10焦少珍,陈淳.2009年课改实验区高考生物试卷与课程标准的一致性研究[J].教育测量与评价(理论版),2010(5):54-58. 被引量:5

共引文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部