期刊文献+

白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合卡铂治疗晚期三阴性乳腺癌的疗效评估 被引量:5

Evaluation of the efficacy of albumin-bound paclitaxel combined with carboplatin in treatment of advanced triple-negative breast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合卡铂治疗晚期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的近期和远期疗效。方法选取2018-03-01至2020-12-31解放军总医院第三医学中心肿瘤科收治的120例晚期转移性TNBC为研究对象,按随机数字表法平均分为两组,对照组采用白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨方案治疗,观察组采用白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合卡铂方案治疗,对比观察两组患者的近期治疗效果、血清肿瘤指标变化、远期治疗效果及不良反应发生情况。结果在随访近期,两组患者的客观缓解率(objective response rate,ORR)及疾病控制率(disease control rate,DCR)对比差异无统计学意义,观察组患者的血清CA125、CA15-3、中期因子(MK)及血小板第4因子(PF4)水平均显著低于对照组(P<0.05),观察组中位无进展生存时间(mPFS)明显长于对照组(4.20个月vs.3.44个月,P<0.05),两组患者的中位总生存时间(mOS)对比差异无统计学意义;在随访远期,观察组的mPFS明显优于对照组(6.77个月vs.5.75个月,P<0.05),观察组患者的mOS明显优于对照组(10.77个月vs.8.78个月,P<0.05)。两组患者的治疗不良反应发生率对比无统计学差异。结论白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合卡铂的近期、远期治疗效果均优于白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合吉西他滨,而两种方案的不良反应未见明显差异。 Objective To observe the short and long term efficacy of albumin-bound paclitaxel combined with carboplatin in the treatment of advanced triple-negative breast cancer(TNBC).Methods A total of 120 patients with advanced metastatic TNBC admitted to the Oncology Department of the Third Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from March 1,2018 to December 31,2020 were selected as the research objects.They were divided into two groups according to the method of random number.The control group was treated with albumin-bound paclitaxel combined with gemcitabine regimen,while the observation group was treated with albumin-bound paclitaxel combined with carboplatin regimen.The short-term treatment effect,changes of serum tumor indexes,long-term treatment effect and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results During the short-term follow-up,there was no significant difference in objective response rate(ORR)and disease control rate(DCR)between the two groups(P<0.05).Serum CA125,CA15-3,MK and PF4 in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group,and the median progression-free survival time(mPFS)in the observation group was significantly longer than that in the control group(4.20 months vs.3.44 months,P<0.05),there was no significant difference in mOS between the two groups.In the long-term follow-up,mPFS of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group(6.77 months vs.5.75 months,P<0.05),and mOS of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group(10.77 months vs.8.78 months,P<0.05).There was no significant difference in adverse reactions between the two groups.Conclusions The short-term and long-term efficacy of albumin-bound paclitaxel combined with carboplatin is due to the combination of albumin-bound paclitaxel and gemcitabine,and there is no significant difference in adverse reactions between the two kinds of treatment.
作者 何波 侯晓杰 慕媛 HE Bo;HOU Xaojie;MU Yuan(Department of Oncology,the Third Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100039,China;Department of Medical Research,Characteristic Medical Center of Chinese People’s Armed Police Force,Tianjin 300162,China;Medical Quality and Safety Management Section,Characteristic Medical Center of Chinese People’s Armed Police Force,Tianjin 300162,China)
出处 《武警医学》 CAS 2023年第2期150-156,共7页 Medical Journal of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force
关键词 晚期三阴性乳腺癌 白蛋白结合型紫杉醇 卡铂 吉西他滨 advanced triple-negative breast cancer albumin-bound paclitaxel carboplatin gemcitabine
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献35

  • 1张保宁,邵志敏,乔新民,李波,姜军,杨名添,王水,宋三泰,张斌,杨红健.中国乳腺癌保乳治疗的前瞻性多中心研究[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(11):680-684. 被引量:247
  • 2SPARANO J A, WANG M, MARTINO S, et al, Weekly paclitaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 358: 1663-1671.
  • 3PICCART-GEBHART M J, BURZYKOWSKI T, BUYSE M, et aL Taxanes alone or in combination with anthracyclines as first-line therapy of patients with metastatic breast cancer [J] . J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26:1980-1986.
  • 4HENDERSON I C, BERRY D A, DEMETRI G D, et al, Improved out-comes from adding sequential paclitaxel, but not from escalating doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2003, 21:976-983.
  • 5IBRAHIM N K, DESAI N, LEGHA S, et aL Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of ABI-007, a Cremophor-free, protein-stabilized, nanoparticle formulation of paclitaxel [J] . Clin Cancer Res, 2002, 8(5}: 1038-1044.
  • 6NYMAN D W, CAMPBELL K J, HERSH E, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetics trial of ABI -007, a novel nanoparticle formulation of paclitaxel in patients with advanced nonhematologic malignancies [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23(31}:7785-7793.
  • 7MONTERO A J, ADAMS B, DIAZ-MONTERO C M, et al. Nab-paclitaxel in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a comprehensive review [J]. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol, 2011,4(3}:329-334.
  • 8GIANNI L, KEARNS C M, GIANI A, et al. Nonlinear pharmacokinetics and metabolism of paclitaxel and its pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships in humans [J]. J Clin Oncol, 1995, 13(1}:180-190.
  • 9SEIDMAN A D, CONLIN A K, BACH A, et al. Randomized phase II trial of weekly vs every 2 weeks vs every 3 weeks nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel with bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer [J]. Clin Breast Cancer, 2013, 13(4}:239-246.
  • 10GRADISHAR W J, TJULANDIN S, DAVIDSON N, et aL Phase ill trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with polyethylated castor oil-based paclitaxel in women with breast cancer [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23(31}:7794-7803.

共引文献70

同被引文献81

引证文献5

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部