期刊文献+

中国是否挤出了美国的对外投资?——“一带一路”背景下基于拉美和加勒比地区的实证研究 被引量:4

Has China Crowded out U.S. OFDI? An Empirical Research Based on Latin America and the Caribbean(LAC) in the Background of the Belt and Road Initiative
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文选取2003—2017年拉美和加勒比35个国家(地区)的面板数据集,采用个体固定效应模型和空间杜宾模型(SDM)进行实证分析。最后得出结论:在拉美和加勒比地区,来自中国的对外直接投资(OFDI)实际上吸引了更多的来自美国的对外直接投资,并且中国的"一带一路"倡议对美国OFDI没有直接显著的负面影响,对这一吸引作用也没有显著的负面影响。在拉丁美洲和加勒比地区中资源不丰富的国家和地区,这一吸引作用并不显著,在政府效率高的国家和地区,"一带一路"倡议削弱了中国OFDI对美国OFDI的吸引作用。本文的研究结果为理解中美在拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的关系提供了一种思路。 This paper aims to study whether China’s OFDI has a significant crowding-out effect on the United States’OFDI in Latin America and the Caribbean(LAC),and to consider the impact of the Belt and Road Initiative.In the context of the strategic contraction of the United States and the active expansion of China’s global participation,western public opinion is worried about China’s rapidly expanding influence in LAC,the traditional sphere of influence of the United States.As OFDI is an important indicator of a country’s overseas economic activities,the study on whether China’s OFDI is crowding out the United States’OFDI provides an important reference for judging the state of China-US relations in LAC.This paper uses a panel data set containing 35 LAC countries(regions)from 2003 to2017,and divides the total sample into two sub-samples respectively according to the scale of natural resource abundance and government efficiency.Based on the gravity model,this paper uses the individual fixed effect model for empirical analysis,and the Spatial Durbin Model(SDM)to test the robustness of the regression results.The regression results of the individual fixed effect model show that,on the whole,every$1 increase in China’s OFDI will lead to a$2.23 increase in the United States’OFDI.For resource-rich countries and regions,every$1 increase in China’s OFDI will lead to a$1.71 increase in the United States’OFDI.For resource-poor countries and regions,China’s OFDI has no significant impact on the United States’OFDI.For countries and regions with high-efficient governments,every$1 increase of China’s OFDI will lead to a$6.31 increase in the United States’OFDI.However,if the host country and China sign a cooperation document to jointly build the Belt and Road,the promotion effect will be reduced to$0.04.For countries and regions with low-efficient governments,every$1 increase in China’s OFDI will lead to a$2.02 increase in the United States’OFDI.Therefore,this paper concludes that in LAC,overall,China’s OFDI attracts the United States’OFDI,and the Belt and Road Initiative has no significant negative impact on the United States’OFDI,and also has no significant negative impact on the attraction of China’s OFDI to the United States’OFDI.However,for resource-poor countries and regions in LAC,the positive impact on the attraction of China’s OFDI to the United States’OFDI is insignificant.For countries and regions with high-efficient governments in LAC,the Belt and Road Initiative weakens the attraction of China’s OFDI to the United States’OFDI.The regression results of SDM verify this conclusion.The results show that Chinese and American capital can coexist in LAC.In the future,these two countries can strengthen cooperation and deepen mutual trust under the framework of the Belt and Road Initiative,so as to eliminate the negative impact of the initiative on the United States’OFDI in some countries and regions.This paper creatively takes the impact of the Belt and Road Initiative into account when studying the crowding-out effect of China’OFDI,and empirically tests the conjecture that China’s ODFI has crowded out the United States’OFDI in LAC through econometrics research.It enriches current research ideas in the field of OFDI.
作者 邵昱 孙雨函 Shao Yu;Sun Yuhan(School of Economics,Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,Shanghai 200433,China)
出处 《外国经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第2期140-152,共13页 Foreign Economics & Management
关键词 对外直接投资 挤出效应 一带一路 OFDI crowding-out effect the Belt and Road
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献174

  • 1蒋冠宏,蒋殿春.中国对发展中国家的投资——东道国制度重要吗?[J].管理世界,2012,28(11):45-56. 被引量:264
  • 2程惠芳,阮翔.用引力模型分析中国对外直接投资的区位选择[J].世界经济,2004,27(11):23-30. 被引量:224
  • 3Diao Xinshen, Yumei Zhang, Kevin Z Chen. The Global Recession and China's Stimulus Package:A General Equilibrium Assessment of Country Level Impacts [ J ]. China Economic Review,2012 ( 23 ) : 1 - 17.
  • 4Bagnai. Alberto :The Role of China in Global External Imbalances : Some further Evidence [ J ]. China Economic Review,2009 (20) :508 - 526.
  • 5Buckley P J, Cross A R, Tan H, Voss H, Liu X. An Investigation of Recent Trends in Chinese Outward Direct Investment and Some Implications for Theory[ R. Centre for International Business University of Leeds Working Paper. Business Week ,2006.
  • 6Buekley P J, Clegg L J, Cross A R, Liu X Voss H, Zheng P. The Determinants of Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment [ J ]. Journal of Interna- tional Business Studies,2007,38 (4) :499 - 518.
  • 7Buckley P J, Casson M. The Future of the Multi - national Enterprise [ M ]. Macmillan : London, 1976.
  • 8Hill C W L,P Hwang,W C Kim. An Eclectic Theory of the Choice of International Entry Mode[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1990,11 (2).
  • 9Randoy T, C C Dibrell. How and Why Norwegian MNCs Commit Resources Abroad:Beyond Choice of Entry Mode[ J]. Management International Re- view, 2002,42 ( 2 ).
  • 10Agarwal S, S N Ramaswami. Choice of Foreign Market Entry Mode : Impact of Ownership, Location, and Internalization Factors [ J ]. Journal of Interna- tional Business Studies, 1992,23 ( 1 ).

共引文献764

同被引文献63

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部