期刊文献+

突发公共卫生事件中紧缺公共医疗资源分配的伦理方案与法律规则 被引量:3

The Ethics and Law of Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in Public Health Emergencies
原文传递
导出
摘要 突发公共卫生事件导致公共医疗资源极度紧缺,在加大资源投入、减少资源浪费或紧急资源调配等措施均不敷所用之际,如何分配就成为无法回避的难题。从尊严主义、功利主义和平等主义三种道德立场出发,可以采用抽签、排队、预后、生命数量、生命年数、工具价值、互惠性、病情、年龄和经济地位等标准来确定医疗资源分配的优先级。但这些标准各有优劣,无法独立决定分配顺位,需要取舍和权衡,故有必要参考域外实践,本着公正、高效和动态的原则,结合多重标准,按照医护人员、先到者、病情更严重者、短期预后更佳者、被抽中者的顺位构建我国突发公共卫生事件中紧缺医疗资源分配的伦理方案。该方案需要法律规则的配套,应从立法形式、执行主体和救济机制三方面调整,完善相关法律制度,包括以软法形式出台统一分配规则、赋予医学伦理委员会决策职能以及畅通申诉、审查和诉讼渠道。 Public health emergencies lead to an extreme shortage of medical resources,When public health emergencies lead to an extreme shortage of medical resources that cannot be eased by measures such as increasing resource input,reducing resource waste or emergency resource deployment,how to allocate these resources becomes an unavoidable problem.How to allocate these resources becomes an unavoidable problem.From the three moral standpoints of deontology,utilitarianism and egalitarianism,criteria such as lottery,queuing,prognosis,number of lives,years of life,instrumental value,reciprocity,condition of illness,age and economic status can be used to determine the priority in allocation of scarce medical resources.However,each of these criteria has its own advantages and disadvantages and cannot be used independently to decide the priority in the allocation of medical resources,which means trade-offs and balancing among these criteria are inevitable.Therefore,it is necessary for China to draw on overseas experiences,base itself on the principles of fairness,efficiency and dynamics,combine multiple standards,and construct an ethical plan for the allocation of scarce medical resources in public health emergencies in the following order of priority:medical staff,first-comers,people with higher risk of infection or the more seriously infected,the better short-term prognosis,and the winners of lottery.The ethical plan also requires the establishment of supporting legal rules and the adjustment and improvement of relevant legal systems in the three aspects of the form rule-making,enforcement body and relief mechanism,including adopting a set of rules on the allocation of medical resources in the form of soft law,giving the decision-making function to medical ethic committees and unblocking the channels of complaint,review and litigation.
作者 彭錞
出处 《环球法律评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第3期39-51,共13页 Global Law Review
基金 作者主持的2020年度国家社会科学基金青年项目“失信联合惩戒制度的法治困境及对策研究”(20CFX019)的研究成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献88

  • 1曹康泰.为确立紧急状态制度提供宪法依据[J].中国人大,2004(12):10-13. 被引量:3
  • 2杨琳.千呼万唤“基本医疗保健法”[J].中国社区医师,2006,22(13):1-1. 被引量:1
  • 3冯·诺伊曼,摩根斯顿.博弈论与经济行为[M].王文玉,王宇译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2004.
  • 4SANDERS B. Measuring community health levels [ J ]. Am J Public Health, 1964, 54( 7 ): 1063-1070.
  • 5SULLIVAN D F. Conceptual problems in developing an index of health [ M ].Series 2, No. 17, Wash D C: US National Center for Health Statislics, 1966.
  • 6FANSHEL S, BUSH J W. A health status index and its application to health services outcomes[ J ]. Oper Rcs, 1970, 18( 6 ): 1021-1066.
  • 7TORRANCE G W, THOMAS W H, SACKETT DL. A utility maximization model for the evaluation of health care programs [ J ]. Health Services Research, 1972, 7( 2 ): 118-133.
  • 8PLISKIN J S, SHEPARD D S, WEINSTEIN M C. Utility functions for life years and health status [ J ]. Oper Res, 1980, 28(11): 206-224.
  • 9McPAKE B, KUMARANAYAKE L, NORMAND C. Health economics: An international perspective [ M ]. London : Routledge, 2002.
  • 10DRUMMOND M F, STODDART GL, TORRANCE GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes [ M ]. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1987.

共引文献57

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部