期刊文献+

行政罚款设定的威慑逻辑及其体系化 被引量:33

The Deterrence Logic of the Setting of Administrative Fines and Its Systematization
原文传递
导出
摘要 缺乏法理逻辑的指引,是立法中罚款设定欠科学的重要原因。行政处罚历经从危险消除到风险预防的模式变迁,其制度逻辑也由事后的消极制裁转向事前的积极威慑。罚款设定应当从一般威慑、特别威慑和威慑补充三个维度构筑周延的预防体系:在一般威慑维度,应基于社会危害概念界定罚款责任基准,通过执法概率将罚款数额"撬动"至最佳水平,并妥善处置与衡平正义之间的张力;在特别威慑维度,应将剥夺不法利益作为罚款的最低标准,并根据违法行为的边际变化调整罚款强度;在威慑补充维度,应统筹协调罚款与相关民、刑责任的竞合。 The lack of guidance by proper jurisprudential logic is an important reason for the unscientific setting of fines in legislation.The mode of administrative punishment has undergone a transformation from that of risk elimination to that of risk prevention.Correspondingly,its institutional logic has also undergone a transition from that of negative sanctions after the event to that of positive deterrence before the event.Fine setting should be aimed at constructing a comprehensive prevention system with three dimensions:general deterrence,special deterrence and deterrence supplementation.In the dimension of general deterrence,benchmarks fine responsibility should be defined on the basis of the concept of social harm,fines should be"leveraged"to the best level of deterrence through law enforcement probability,and their tension with equity and justice should be correctly handled;in the dimension of special deterrence,the deprivation of illegal interests should be taken as the minimum standard of fine,and the intensity of fine should be adjusted according to the marginal change of illegal acts;and in the supplementary dimension of deterrence,the concurrence between fines and civil and criminal liabilities should be coordinated.
作者 谭冰霖
出处 《环球法律评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第2期22-38,共17页 Global Law Review
基金 作者主持的2019年度国家社会科学基金青年项目“行政罚款数额设定的法理标准与制度设计研究”(19CFX027)的研究成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

二级参考文献517

共引文献2615

同被引文献593

引证文献33

二级引证文献145

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部