期刊文献+

互操作的意义及法律构造 被引量:13

原文传递
导出
摘要 互操作有利于竞争与创新,也符合企业利益。市场竞争环境下,不同企业对于互操作会有不同的选择,是正常现象。为此,需要不同法律制度的体系性构造,既保证小平台互操作权利的实现,又在维护公平竞争底线的过程中避免对大平台采取一刀切做法,以调动不同平台持续创新的积极性。我国目前的制度构造缺乏整体设计,既不利于全面调动不同主体的积极性,也不利于充分利用法律武器维护我国的国家利益。需要科学理解《数据二十条》,按照《数字中国建设整体布局规划》,及时按程序调整不适应数字化发展的法律制度。 Interoperability is good for competition and innovation,and also consistent with enterprises'interests.However,it is normal that different enterprises might have different choices of interoperability strategy under respective circumstances of market competition.For this reason,in order to incentivize continuing innovation for different platforms,systematic construction of legal institutions is needed,assuring rights to interoperate for small platforms on the one hand,and avoiding one-size-fits-all methods while leveling fair playing ground for big platforms on the other hand.Current institutional construction in China lacks comprehensive design,and it is not favorable to mobilize enthusiasm of different platforms as well as safeguard national interest via efficient use of legal weapon.It is necessary to interpret the Twenty Articles of Data scientifically,and to amend relevant legal provisions inconsistent with digital development in a timely manner and procedures,according to the Comprehensive Framework Planning of Digital China Construction.
作者 周汉华
出处 《中外法学》 北大核心 2023年第3期605-624,共20页 Peking University Law Journal
关键词 互操作 网络效应 竞争与创新 反向工程 双重标准 Interoperability Network Effects Competition and Innovation Reverse Engineering Double Standards
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献432

共引文献624

同被引文献281

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部