期刊文献+

团队交流对公共品自愿供给的影响——来自实验经济学的证据

The Effect of Team Communication on the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods--Evidence from Experimental Economics
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于公共品自愿供给实验,我们检验了团队交流对公共品自愿供给的影响。实验发现,由于团队交流机制产生了社会资本,被试的公共品贡献显著提升。进一步研究发现,相对于自由型团队交流,任务型团队交流的公共品贡献增长幅度更高。参与过团队交流的被试被重新分组再进行实验时,即使新团队没有进一步交流,公共品贡献仍有明显的增长,表明通过团队交流产生的社会资本具有可转移性。研究结果给公共品自愿供给的实际应用提供了重要的依据和启示。 Based on the experiment of voluntary provision of public goods,we examine the effect of team communication on the voluntary provision of public goods.The results show that public goods contributions of subjects increased significantly due to the social capital generated by the team communication mechanism.Further research suggests that compared with free-form team communication,the contribution of public goods of task-based team communication increased higher.When the subjects who had participated in team communication were regrouped,even if the new group did not further communicate,the contribution of public goods still increased significantly,indicating that the social capital generated through team communication is transferable.The research results provide important basis and enlightenment for the practical application of voluntary provision of public goods.
作者 潘晨 武志伟 Chen Pan;Zhiwei Wu(Business School,Nanjing University,Nanjing,China,210093;School of Economics,Nanjing University,Nanjing,China,210093)
出处 《南大商学评论》 2022年第1期159-173,共15页 Nanjing Business Review
关键词 公共品自愿供给 团队交流 社会资本 可转移性 Voluntary Provision of Public Goods Team Communication Social Capital Transferability
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献154

  • 1王杰秀,安超.我国大城市养老服务的特点和发展策略[J].社会政策研究,2019,0(4):58-82. 被引量:18
  • 2王列.时间进程中的经济成效[J].经济社会体制比较,1995(6):18-23. 被引量:34
  • 3蔡彤.公共物品供给模式选择与政府行为负外部性的防范[J].经济管理,2005,31(16):92-96. 被引量:10
  • 4黄艺红,刘海涌.城市老年人服务需求的实证研究[J].北华大学学报(社会科学版),2006,7(2):89-93. 被引量:33
  • 5Sadrieh, A., and Verbon, H.A.A., 2006, “Inequality, Cooperation, and Growth: An Experimental Study”, European Economic Review, 5: 1197-1222.
  • 6Isaac, R.M., McCue, K., and Plott, C., 1985, "Public Goods Provision in an Experimental Environment", Journal of Public Economics, 26: 51-74.
  • 7Isaac, R.M., and Walker, J.M., 1988b, “Group Size Effects in Public Goods Provision: The Voluntary Contribution Mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103 : 179-199.
  • 8Isaac, R.M., Walker, J.M., and Williams, A., 1994, “Group Size and the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: Experimental Evidence Utilizing Very Large Groups”, Journal of Public Economics, 54: 1-36.
  • 9Kurzban, R., and Houser, D., 2005, “Experiments Investigating Cooperative Types in Humans: A Complement to Evolutionary Theory and Simulations”, PNAS, 102: 1803-1807.
  • 10Laury, S.K., Walker, J.M., and Williams A.W., 1999, "The Voluntary Provision of a Pure Public Good with Diminishing Marginal Returns", Public Choice, 99: 139-160.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部