期刊文献+

“放管服”视域下高校科研经费“包干制”的实施困境与应对策略 被引量:5

Difficulties and Countermeasures of Overall Rationing System for University Scientific Research Funds from the Perspective of Reform of Government Functions
原文传递
导出
摘要 高校作为科学研究的主力军,推行科研经费“包干制”对激发高校科研人员创新活力、提高科技创新效率具有一定意义。采取文本分析法对现有政策文件进行梳理,在分析当前我国高校科研经费管理现状的基础上,探究“包干制”改革的难点。研究表明,“包干制”内容与范围不明确、传统管理思想转变困难、财务管理体系不适应以及内部控制管理不完善等因素是当前高校推行包干制改革的难点。最后基于“放管服”改革的背景提出经费“包干制”实施的应对策略,以期促进该政策尽快落地见效。 Universities are as the main force of scientific research.Pushing overall rationing system is to stimulate the innovative of scientific researchers in universities,which has the significance of improving the rate of scientific innovation.This study used the text analysis to do up the existing policy documents,analyzed the management of research funds,and explored the difficulties of overall rationing system.The research results show the following difficulties:the content and scope of overall rationing system are not clear,traditional management idea is difficult to change,the financial management system is not adapted,internal control management is not perfect,etc.Finally,this paper proposed the countermeasures of overall rationing system to push this policy to implement and to be effective on the basis of the reform of government functions.
作者 李爱彬 唐巧玉 LI Aibin;TANG Qiaoyu
出处 《煤炭高等教育》 2022年第3期40-46,共7页 Meitan Higher Education
基金 江苏省软科学研究计划项目“江苏科研经费‘包干制’政策效应评价及优化策略研究”(BR2021010) 徐州软科学研究项目“徐州市科技创新政策实效评估研究”(KC21365) 江苏省教育科学“十四五”规划2021年度课题“基于高质量发展目标的江苏高水平大学建设绩效评价机制研究”(B/2021/01/83)
关键词 “放管服” 高校科研经费管理 经费“包干制” reform of government functions research funds management in universities overall rationing system
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献78

  • 1刘圣中.不信任文化中的非人格化管理——匿名评审、年龄界限与一刀切现象的综合分析[J].公共管理学报,2007,4(2):71-77. 被引量:12
  • 2贺德方.美国、英国、日本三国政府科研机构经费管理比较研究[J].中国软科学,2007(7):87-96. 被引量:46
  • 3湛毅青,李一智,陈军.启示与思考:英国大学科研的政府资助体系[J].科研管理,2007,28(5):143-149. 被引量:16
  • 4Billing A B, Buagu G N M, Moore J W. The effects of funding source and management ownership on the pro- ductivity of R&D [ J ]. R&D Management, 2004, 34 (3) :281 -294.
  • 5Jelinek M, Griffith T L. Organizational science and the NSF : funding for mutual benefit [ J ]. Organization Sci- enee, 2005,16 ( 5 ) :550 - 559.
  • 6John R, Keith J, Derrick F B. Charaeterisation and measurement methods for author productivity and re- search vitality: A study of the R&D management field [ J ]. Research Evaluation,2008,17 ( 1 ) :59 - 69.
  • 7Bloch C, Sorensen M P, Graversen E K, et al. Develo- ping a methodology to assess the impact of research grant funding: A mixed methods approach [ J ]. Evaluation and Program Planning,2014,43 ( 1 ) : 105 - 117.
  • 8Lane J. Assessing the impact of science funding [ J ]. Science, 2009,324 : 1273 - 1275.
  • 9Lane J, Bertuzzi S. Measuring the results of science in- vestments[ J]. Science, 2011,331 : 678 - 680.
  • 10Salter A J, Martin B R. The economic benefits of pub- licly funded basic research: A critical review [ J]. Re- search Policy, 2001,30 ( 3 ) : 509 - 532.

同被引文献42

引证文献5

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部